Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

20 VCT Embrace the Public

 It is time the public heard of positive developments regarding vehicle theft reporting and investigation.  A certain amount of ‘connectivity’ would send a deterrent message.  

Blaming vehicle manufacturers is passing the buck. If the Police have inadequate resources, they should seek partnerships with their stakeholders. 

The public should be encouraged to report suspicions concerning vehicle theft. Video something dodgy, upload it. This flow of data, in a format that can be searched, could be useful both for investigation and as a deterrent.

Video Upload of Dashcam / mobile phone records is currently possible with NextBase ( a dashcam supplier – commonly seen at Halfords), it is police-oriented. We have an RTC slant and will shortly have a process for insureds, any party, to upload collision footage for claim/insurance purposes. The time and expense otherwise spent in Court would provide considerable savings, because dashcam footage is rarely challenged.

I would suggest someone is much more likely to upload a video to a ‘formal’ site than the likes of http://ratethatdriver.co.uk/*, yet even here there are those who will report useful information: MJ56WFK – Driver clearly wasn’t paying attention at the give way bollard, and went straight over it. To add insult to injury, their MOT has expired Nov 2018. Huntingdon http://sendvid.com/5eo4708p**

*currently (09/2025)offline.
**no longer available

In conclusion, I am calling upon constabularies to take the GDPR nettle as a reason to co-operate with relevant stakeholders, to design systems which take advantage of the digital systems which now surround us, to save their own costs and reduce crime.

The reported increase in vehicle crime is not just (if at all) a result of manufacturers ‘dropping the ball’, it is because the police have stood still and the criminal world has moved on. Thieves dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another. One way or another, they will take a vehicle if they want it … no one wants to make it easy for them but where is the deterrent?

What was intended to be an enhancement to the protection of personal data [the D.P.A.], has been turned into a reason to withdraw from engagement with victims of crime, insurers and their appointed agents. The criminals have taken advantage of this withdrawal, and until that issue has been addressed, vehicle-related crime figures will only deteriorate further. We are now fighting against crime with one hand behind our backs, and being blindfolded too.


Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme