Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

240723 NPCC & Disclosure of Vehicle Makes & Models

11/07/2024, the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) issued guidance that the makes & models of vehicles were not to be disclosed – the guidance can be read here. The submission was quickly superseded:

It is understood a U-turn occurred 12 days later, 23/07/2024:

Further to the below email which was circulated [redacted] last week and was in line with the views of the policing lead at the time, we have received some challenge from forces regarding the position taken.

As part of this, further information was provided to us stating that makes and models of stolen
vehicles are routinely provided by DVLA under FOI and subsequently published by a variety of
sources including insurance companies and motoring journals; the opinion was that this action
undermined any argument that a disclosure by police would directly prejudice the commercial
interests of a vehicle manufacturer because similar information was already out there, sourced from
an official body (DVLA).

Given that fact, [redacted] we have reassessed and amended the stance.

The lead now agrees that s43 CANNOT be relied upon to exempt makes and models of stolen
vehicles when requested under FOI.

The consistent release of such data by DVLA under FOI undermines that position to the extent that it would not stand up to scrutiny if challenged.

Furthermore, the policing lead has agreed that the original view that harm to partnership working
between national policing and vehicle manufacturers would be realised through disclosure (which
engaged s31) is, in fact, not sufficient enough to rely on for a high level request such as this –

lower level detail, e.g. specifics of individual types of vehicle crime by manufacturer would be required to
engage this harm.

Therefore, they are now in agreement that for requests for makes and models of all stolen vehicles in the force area, s31 DOES NOT apply either.

In short, please be advised of our updated stance which is that makes and models of stolen vehicles
can be provided if requested under FOI.

VRN’s, if requested, remain exempt from disclosure under s40(2).

The disclosure can be found at WhatDoTheyKnow.com – the full, painful history can be read here.


There remains some confusion about the ‘lower level detail’; what is meant by this, how ‘makes & models’ do not fall to the lower level cited.

The circulations, obtained from West Midlands Police, can be read here as part of a FoIA request here.

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme