Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contacts
  • News
  • Interesting & Reference
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

240913 W. Mercia Disclosure email to caseworkers

In August 2024, West Mercia Police apparently responded to a request for information:

‘Please note, following a change in advice from the National Police Chiefs Council and the Information Commissioners Office, we are no longer able to provide you with third party details and therefore this information has been redacted from the enclosed report.‘

It appeared there had been advice received subsequent to that of 2023 relating to disclosures sought following a RTC, requests relating to s170 of the RTA 1988; the duty of driver to stop, report accident and give information or documents.

However, having sought further information it transpires W. Mercia police has advised their Traffic Process Unit as follows:

Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024
Subject: Sharing Limited Details and Police Reports

We have since received further clarification around what we can do.

Requests for Disclosure

Requests for disclosure relating to road traffic collisions are generally made by the insurers of the vehicles involved in the collision, or the party’s legal representatives and are requested for the purpose of reaching an early agreement as to who is at fault for the collision.

There are also situations where individuals make disclosure requests.

Disclosure Considerations

The information Commissioners Office (ICO) reminds the police of the questions that need to be considered when sharing personal data.

In short, we will continue to ask for the individual’s permission to share information however, should that not be forthcoming and we receive a request for exchange of details we can consider the below:

  • Who is requesting this information?
  • What information is being requested?
  • Is sharing this information necessary?
  • Do the Police alone hold this information?
  • Are there alternatives to disclosure, which could also achieve the objectives?
  • Is the sharing of the information proportionate?
  • What impact will this disclosure have on others? i.e. who else might be impacted by this disclosure.
  • Could there be an impact on others right of privacy?

Disclosure should be made on a case-by-case basis.

If we are satisfied that the request is to assist with civil litigation / prospective civil litigation, we can disclose, providing we record our considerations.

Disclosure Process

We can return to our previous working practices for sharing limited details, providing we can satisfy ourselves of the above disclosure considerations. In doing this we must complete the document for each case and save it in the electronic file. Completing the form will walk you through the decision-making process.

Our fallback position will be to only disclose to insurance/ solicitors wherever possible as this will mitigate a lot of the risk around disclosure.

It is accepted that there will be the odd occasion where individuals are representing themselves etc. Disclosure may be made but there still needs to be consideration as there is perhaps an increased risk when providing this information as it may not necessarily be used for the purposes of civil proceedings. In some cases, disclosure could give rise to harm to individuals whose personal data has been disclosed

Enabling section of the DPA – litigation or prospective litigation:

Information required to be disclosed by law etc or in connection with legal proceedings

5
(1) The listed GDPR provisions do not apply to personal data consisting of information that the controller is obliged by an enactment to make available to the public, to the extent that the application of those provisions would prevent the controller from complying with that obligation.

(2) The listed GDPR provisions do not apply to personal data where disclosure of the data is required by an enactment, a rule of law or an order of a court or tribunal, to the extent that the application of those provisions would prevent the controller from making the disclosure.

(3) The listed GDPR provisions do not apply to personal data where disclosure of the data

(a)is necessary for the purpose of, or in connection with, legal proceedings (including prospective legal proceedings),

(b)is necessary for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, or

(c)is otherwise necessary for the purposes of establishing, exercising or defending legal rights, to the extent that the application of those provisions would prevent the controller from making the disclosure.

ICO Guidance regarding enabling sections – ‘exemptions’

For organisations / Guide to Data Protection / Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)/ Exemptions

FoIA source

Recent Posts:

  • Crime Reports – Copies of ‘Consent’
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme