Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Vehicle Taking by Security Compromise

The 2019 Vehicle Crime Taskforce, to be spearheaded by the West Midlands Police & Crime Commissioner’s office, met and agreed:

  • Better information about the methods used to commit vehicle theft, including how often those methods are used in practice, is key to understanding the threat.
  • In order to further develop the evidence base, it would be helpful if Taskforce members could share information they had about methods used by criminals
    Home Office Agenda & Minutes

However, the VCT never met again, and seemingly little consideration was given to ‘understanding the threat’. Subsequent statements about the incidence of keyless taking appear to be based on ‘gut reaction’ or ‘holding a finger in the air’.

To this day, vehicle taking methodology is unrecroded by most, if not all, constabularies. Examples of the responses to requests for related information appear below.

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) – 2019

How many of these thefts have been achieved by thieves using ‘keyless’ technology, whereby they have entered and removed the car without using its keys?

  • This information would be recorded within the investigation details of the crime report, which are not electronically searchable
    More here.

West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner – 2020

asked for the evidence vehicle security/bypass (keyless theft) is to blame for increased car thefts, the number of prosecutions for possession of vehicle security bypass/interference (all technology-related vehicle theft methods) thefts and the developments tackling the security weaknesses that are said to exist in many keyless cars, Mr Jamieson’s office responded:

  • There is no correspondence held within the Offices of the Police and Crime Commissioner relating to this subject
    More here

West Midland Police – 2022

WMP were asked for information to support their ‘keyless crime’ statements. Passed from pillar to post, ultimately, it appeared there was no evidence to support the statements being made. More here.

Merseyside Police – 03/2022

The constabulary was asked to provide ‘The number of reported keyless car thefts from January 2020 to the current date (03/2022), broken down by month and vehicle type’ and responded:

  • a keyword search of “Keyless” theft of motor vehicle has been undertaken and the below table provides a monthly breakdown of crimes recorded. However, the search does not include the vehicle type and attempting to drill into each individual crime to establish the vehicle type would exceed the 18-hour cost limit
    248 vehicle thefts were recorded for the period
    More here

Thames Valley Police – 03/2022

The constabulary was asked to provide ‘The number of reported keyless car thefts from January 2020 to the current date (03/2022), broken down by month and vehicle type’ and responded:

  • Every theft of vehicle would have to be manually reviewed in order to determine if it involved a keyless method of entry. Due to the number of reports that would require review, this will exceed the appropriate 18 hour time and £450 cost limit.
    More here

Cheshire Police – 03/2022

The constabulary was asked to provide ‘The number of reported keyless car thefts from January 2020 to the current date (03/2022), broken down by month and vehicle type’ and responded:

  • ‘… we would have to read through every theft from a vehicle crime to establish if it was keyless.
    There are over 3200 relating to this subject.
  • It would take one member of staff approximately 5 minutes per record equating to in excess of 260 hours of work.
    Your entire request is therefore refused.
    More here

The above 03/2022 responses form a series of requests to most, if not all UK constabularies in 03/2022, which can be located by searching ‘keyless’ at the WhatDoTheyKnow.com service.

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) – 03/2024

Keyless Theft Info’ –

  • the MPS ‘does not hold the information you require centrally in a format that can be extracted to provide the information you have requested’.
    More here.

West Midlands Police (WMP) – 07/2024

The total number of vehicles stolen in the specified period without keys (without the use of the owner’s keys or
key fob)

  • We do not have a search criterion for this “keyless” data – therefore it would require a search of in excess of 14000 records to assess whether or not it was a keyless activity.
  • This would exceed the cost for the purpose of the FOI act. unable to provide keyless data
    More here

Staffordshire Police – 07/2024

The total number of Jaguar, Land Rover or Range Rover vehicles stolen in the specified period without keys (without the use of the owners keys or key fob).

  • There is no method by which we can readily retrieve information from our systems to answer this request. For the time period requested, there have been in excess of 2,000 occurrences of theft of a motor vehicle, in order to determine whether any were keyless ignition vehicles, or whether they were stolen without the use of a key, the record for each offence would require manual review.
  • To extract this data would therefore require a very labour-intensive manual trawl through each record. From dip sampling, it has been estimated that it would take approximately 3 minutes to review each record, this would equate to over 100 hours to provide the requested information. To achieve this task would therefore exceed the 18-hour time and cost threshold of the Freedom of Information Act by some considerable margin
    More here

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) – 02/2025

  • To locate and retrieve information in relation to keyless technology ‘relay theft’ or ‘jamming’ would require a manual read of thousands of motor theft crime reports.
    More here.

Lincolnshire police – 02/2025

the method of theft i.e. with keys, keyless etc.

  • ‘Lincolnshire Police would have to manually search the relevant records’ & ‘the business area dealing indicated that the data you requested is rarely stated on the record (i.e. often recorded as unknown entry)‘.’
    More here.

Keyless quotes:

  • ‘we are seeing criminals revert to ‘old school’ methods to steal cars, such as breaking into houses or physically threatening and assaulting owners to take keys‘. (Express – quote from a Tracker article 03/2025)

  • ‘ …. vehicle crime-related offences, including burglary and theft of car keys which is an increasingly common tactic used by criminals‘. (NPCC September 2024)

  • ‘When it comes to theft from vehicles, more ‘traditional’ techniques such as smashing windows and forcing doors are the preferred methods’. (motoringresearch.com – May 2023)

Keyless Contradiction

A vehicle was found crashed/damaged by the police. Subsequently, the owner/insured/victim reported the vehicle theft by keyless means.

The police issued a crime number, and a claim for theft/damage was submitted to insurers.

  • Think!

If professional/organised criminals are responsible for such taking, what do they achieve by smashing up & abandoning their ill-gotten gains?

Scoring/profiling; such allegations should give rise to concerns and questions. The potential for unprofessional disorganization in such circumstances is high, as evidenced by the outcome. Read more here.

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme