Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contacts
  • News
  • Interesting & Reference
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft

Posted on November 16, 2024December 4, 2024 by 5@mwosb.co.uk

INTRODUCTION

please skip to ‘VEHICLE THEFT’ (below) if this bores you …

In today’s complex and ever-evolving society, the role of police staff has become increasingly challenging, and fraught with pressures that can be overwhelming. The nature of crime has diversified significantly, with officers now encountering a broader spectrum of criminal activity than ever before. From cybercrime and terrorism to mental health crises and domestic violence, the demands on law enforcement have expanded beyond traditional boundaries, requiring them to be not only enforcers of the law but also first responders, mediators, and mental health professionals.

The rapid pace of technological advancement has introduced new forms of crime, such as cyberattacks and online fraud, which require specialized knowledge and resources many struggle to provide. Meanwhile, social issues like homelessness and substance abuse have become more prominent, often placing officers in situations where they must manage delicate, potentially volatile scenarios with limited training and support.

Moreover, the public scrutiny and accountability faced by police officers today are unprecedented. With the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle, every action taken by law enforcement is subject to immediate public and media scrutiny, adding another layer of stress to an already demanding job. These pressures, combined with the diverse and unpredictable nature of modern crime, create an environment where police officers are often stretched to their limits, both mentally and physically, as they strive to protect and serve their communities. Mistakes WILL be made, someone WILL jump on these!

I, like many ‘ex-job’, am no longer faced with such a volatile, baffling array of issues … and have not been for some time, thankfully. However, I do not trot out hackneyed platitudes such as ‘it’s not like it was in my day’ or ‘what has the job become?’ … it is what it is; affected by, reflecting, the diversity of the world in which we live.

What baffles me about ‘the job’ is the lack of engagement with those able and willing to help, those who are, in many respects, doing what one may expect an officer to do – investigate.

Sure, we are all subject to performance indicators, priorities and proportionality considerations. Time stops for no man and there is only so much in a day. And so, to an area of my expertise …

VEHICLE THEFT

Handling a report of crime over the phone is practical for many reasons. Popping the VRM on the PNC LoS is necessary and … that is pretty much it (please do not mention ANPR) unless there are obvious indicators that all is not as presented.

But even if there are discrepancies or concerns apparent, do the police have time to address these, to iron out the wrinkles … who will thank them for doing so? Fraud may be at play, and this is complex, time-consuming, distracting …

Insurer or Loss Adjuster to the rescue! Well, not quite; we do not don cape or underwear over spandex tights (and I trust those who know me are not now struggling to get an image out of their head). But we do ask questions, quite a lot of them because we have many facets of the loss to consider – you will get a good idea of the areas we cover at www.cmaclaims.co.uk/help .

These facets of a claim are interwoven. We collate & compare enabling ‘Green-Lighting’ of most. Not all we discover is relevant to the police, much could be. We are discretionary in our approaches.

Loss circumstances are, of course, an important area of our consideration. Even here we do not trouble constabularies with the annoying ‘is the car reported stolen?’. We determine this without troubling police staff … and do more with data as our clients are aware!

Now, I could turn this into a lengthy article detailing all the ways we can assist and how current procedures require review. I may tackle that challenge another day, but for now, a few thoughts I believe could make a difference:

a)    Standardise vehicle theft questioning nationwide. Ideally, use a common platform/database – a bit long-term.  In the interim, devise pertinent, probing questioning. We are happy to help.

b)    Run some simple analysis on a VRM – this will help:

c)     ‘Score’ (profile) reports to determine which warrants further attention.  We do this, we can assist.

d)    If a vehicle is found before, or shortly after, the report of ‘theft’, ask yourselves ‘why?’, more so if:

e)    a vehicle is found crashed/damaged?  ‘Professional’ (in it for profit) criminals gain nothing if they damage & ditch the proceeds of their crime

f)     Do not be quick to jump to ‘it was keyless theft’

g)    Conclude your questioning with something like ‘do you consent to us providing a copy of this report to your insurer if they should seek it?’ Be kind to your disclosure departments and potentially a revenue stream!

h)    Reword your letters to victims – be imaginative.  No one likes to hear the police have closed a crime within minutes/hours because … crooks are professional, organised and the police … nothing we can do!

And, regarding the PNC LoS register, please, ask yourselves whether:

i)      the 6-week weeding of stolen reports is relevant, necessary or does more harm than good?  Time to stop this labour-intensive weeding process?

j)      The 6-year weeding process is damaging.  Is it necessary, or beneficial? Would ceasing the process cause an issue?

Did you know … an analysis of vehicle thefts (admittedly 20+ years ago) found that 20% to 30% of reported thefts were tainted by fraud?

How many of your vehicle theft allegations are currently considered compromised or corrupted? Do you know? Can you tell?

Why would the instance of fraud be less now? Imagine the effect this could have on crime statistics!

For those who are not pulling the wool over the eyes of the police (to gain the perceived ‘golden ticket’ crime number and similarly try and dupe an insurer), how do you think victims perceive the failure to disclose police reports to insurers or their representatives? In cases of theft, if the stolen vehicle has not been recovered in its original condition, who is responsible for compensating the victim; why not expedite this process?

I urge police staff of any rank: if you believe more needs to be done about vehicle theft and think I or my team can help, please contact me. As a recent article in Policing Insight rightly stated, “To solve the complex puzzles of modern crime, investigators need to work together seamlessly.”

Today the police, tomorrow …. DVLA, Finance Companies, Manufacturers, Tracking companies …

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts:

  • Crime Reports – Copies of ‘Consent’
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme