Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Switzerland

  1. Under what circumstances can a stolen vehicle be seized in your country?
  • A stolen vehicle being sought by another country may be seized in our country.
  1. What channels are used to notify the owner of the vehicle’s location (Interpol or other)?
  • If a vehicle that was stolen in a neighbouring country is found in Switzerland, the local police in the victim’s country are generally informed directly. For non-neighbouring countries, the discovery is announced through Interpol channels.
  1. Who is responsible for the storage of seized vehicles?
  • The local police are responsible for storing seized vehicles.
  1. Are there any costs associated with storage of a seized stolen vehicle and who is responsible for these costs?
  • If the rightful owner of a vehicle, who has been informed of its discovery, does not collect it within the specified period (usually one or two weeks) a storage charge is levied. The owner of the vehicle must pay the storage charge and any towing charges when the vehicle is released.
  1. How does a stolen vehicle get restored to its legal owner?
    Do the police have authority to restore the vehicle?
  • If the vehicle has simply been found, restitution is dealt with through the police of the area where it was found.

Is it the local court who authorises release of the vehicle?

  • Stolen vehicles that have been sold in Switzerland may be seized on the basis of a judicial order and kept until proof of legal acquisition has been provided. They may then be handed over to their rightful owners. Any losses incurred must be dealt with in the civil courts.

Is it necessary to have a “commission rogatoire” to recover the vehicle?

  • If the purchaser cannot prove that he acquired the vehicle in good faith and is consequently suspected of receiving stolen property, a criminal investigation will be initiated. The decision on releasing the vehicle will then be taken by the appropriate court which will inform the victim accordingly.

What documentation does the owner have to provide in order to recover the vehicle?

  • The owner of a vehicle must produce proof of his identity and the documents pertaining to the vehicle in order to recover a vehicle seized by the police. If he wishes the vehicle to be released to a third party, that person must hold an authorization from the owner or the appropriate insurance company.
  1. Are there any time limits associated with recovery of the vehicle? (i.e. after a certain period of time the vehicle becomes the property of the state or police, etc.)?
  • No time limit is set for recovering vehicles. However, the appropriate authorities may make use of a seized vehicle if the cost of storing it exceeds the value of the vehicle. Before a measure of this type is taken, the owner is informed and given a final date for recovering the vehicle, subject to payment of all costs.
  1. Please give details of relevant legislation
  • This question overlaps with other questions.
  1. If the law in your country precludes the restitution of a stolen vehicle to its original owner, please give the reasons why
  • See answer under (5,b).
  1. Does your country have any bilateral treaties, conventions, or agreements with other countries dealing with the recovery of stolen property? If so, please describe how they operate and give details of the countries concerned
  • Switzerland has not concluded any treaties or agreements with other countries or signed any conventions on the restitution of stolen vehicles.
  1. Reference point, for assistance in case of difficulties
  • The Swiss NCB in Berne.

Last Update: June 2008

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme