Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Policing

The primary objective of the police in the UK is to maintain law and order, prevent crime, and protect the public. Over time, this mission has evolved, reflecting changes in societal expectations, legal frameworks, and the nature of crime itself.

For those who served in the Metropolitan Police Service some years ago, you could expect to be tasked with learning ‘word perfect’ the following paragraph:

  • “The primary object of an efficient police is the prevention of crime: the next that of detection and punishment of offenders if crime is committed. To these ends all the efforts of police must be directed. The protection of life and property, the preservation of public tranquillity, and the absence of crime, will alone prove whether those efforts have been successful and whether the objects for which the police were appointed have been attained.”   

The above quote is attributed to the first commissioner of the Metropolitan Police in London, Sir Richard Mayne (source).

The modern UK police force was established with the creation of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 by then Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel (quotes). The principles he introduced, known as the Peelian Principles, are often cited as the ethical basis for policing by consent, a philosophy where the police’s authority is derived from public cooperation rather than fear or force. While Peel himself did not formally document these as a single set of rules, they were developed based on his ideas and the practices of the newly formed police force.

The Nine Peelian Principles:

  1. The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
    • The central role of the police is crime prevention rather than merely responding to crime.
  2. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.
    • Police effectiveness relies on maintaining public trust and confidence.
  3. Police must secure the willing cooperation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
    • The police rely on public cooperation and lawfulness to succeed in their role.
  4. The degree of cooperation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
    • The more force police use, the less public cooperation they will obtain.
  5. Police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
    • Police must act impartially and serve justice without bias or favoritism.
  6. Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.
    • Force should be a last resort after other methods, like persuasion, have failed.
  7. Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police.
    • The police are members of the community they serve, and the public shares responsibility for maintaining law and order.
  8. Police should always direct their actions strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
    • Police should not overstep their role by acting as judge or punisher.
  9. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
    • The effectiveness of the police is measured by the lack of crime, not by how often they have to respond to it.

Evolution and Influence:

  • These principles reflect a community-centered approach to policing, emphasizing public trust, minimal use of force, and impartiality.
  • They are still highly influential today and shape policing philosophy in many democratic countries around the world, including the UK, the US, and Canada.

Sources and References:

  1. “Policing by Consent: Understanding the Peelian Principles”, College of Policing, UK Government. This source outlines the importance of these principles in modern British policing.
  2. “Peel’s Principles of Policing”, The Police Foundation (US), a resource often cited in discussions of community policing and law enforcement philosophy.
  3. “The Peelian Principles: A Legacy of Ethical Policing”, articles and studies within academic and policing journals, such as those from the Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press, often reference these principles in historical and contemporary law enforcement contexts.

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme