Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

‘Stolen by Fraud’

An example of the confusion that can give rise to misunderstandings and affect perception of vehicle crime in the UK.

THEFT – typically, the owner leaves their vehicle parked, locked secure and unattended returning later to find it has gone. The vehicle has been taken without their consent (s12 Theft Act 1968). The difference between ‘taken’ & ‘stolen’ can be read here.

FRAUD – typically, the owner is tricked into parting with their vehicle. They willingly give up possession of the vehicle, usually believing they have received payment for it. Examples being the vehicle was

  • paid for using a credit card that it later transpires was stolen
  • obtained on finance by a rogue impersonating another – an example and how this has a bearing on claims to the vehicle can be read here – Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003]

Stolen by Fraud

There is no such offence. The vehicle was either taken (a Theft Act offence) or obtained by deception (since 2006, a Fraud Act offence)

  • ‘When they were stolen seven years ago, as part of a finance fraud, the police said they were worth an eye-watering £6.5 million’ (Telegraph)

Were the vehicles stolen or were they taken by fraud? The answer appears almost certainly FRAUD. In which case, these vehicles are unlikely to form part of the 10,000’s the police record as STOLEN each year; ‘fraud’ has a different Home Office classification code. The recoveries & repatriation are therefore unlikely to be making a dent in the STOLEN figures.

Their ‘Lost or Stolen’ (LoS) records can be found here – 2023 & 2024 NaVCIS PNC LoS submissions.

The above article further states:

  • The haul is part of a car theft epidemic that shows no sign of abating

A theft or fraud epidemic? There is more:

  • In total, 35 cars were stolen to order for the right-hand-drive
  • Further investigation by NaVCIS discovered that containers with more cars, which were stolen in the same way by the same gang
  • Without realising that the cars had been stolen in the UK

Yet the article explains ‘Criminals involved in the scam obtained the cars on finance from legitimate UK dealerships’ i.e. this is finance fraud.

The article adds:

  • Police believe that organised crime gangs are responsible for about four in five car thefts in the UK.

If this is accurate then it is evident much more needs to be done to tackle the problem. But is it really the case that organised crime is accounting for 80% of the UK’s vehicle THEFTS … or is it that they are behind what appears to be the more ‘technical’ (complex) offence of fraud?

Recent Posts:

  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme