Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Sweden

  1. Under what circumstances can a stolen vehicle be seized in your country?
  • Chapter 27 Section 1 paragraph of the Swedish Code on Judicial Procedure contains the following provisions on seizures:

Objects which reasonably can assumed to be of importance for the investigation of an offence, or to have been taken from a person or to be subject to forfeiture by reason of an offence, may be seized by order of the police officer conducting the investigation or the prosecutor. If a delay entails risks the decision may be taken by a police office.

  1. What channels are used to notify the owner of the vehicle’s location (Interpol or other)?
  • The owner is notified via Interpol or the local police or liaison officer if available.
  1. Who is responsible for the storage of seized vehicles?
  • The responsibility for a seized vehicle rests with the police authority of the police district in which the vehicle was found. The vehicle is normally kept in a car pound near the police station. In some cases, private garages or car dealer premises may be utilized.
  1. Are there any costs associated with storage of a seized stolen vehicle and who is responsible for these costs?
  • Usually the owner is not charged any parking or storage expenses.
  1. How does a stolen vehicle get restored to its legal owner?
  • An owner retrieves his seized vehicle upon presentation of ownership documentation after the seizure has been revoked.

a) Do the police have authority to restore the vehicle?

  • Yes, in most cases.

b) Is it the local court who authorizes release of the vehicle?

  • No, in most cases the officer conducting the investigation or the prosecutor.

c) Is it necessary to have a “commission rogatoire” to recover the vehicle?

  • No.

d) What documentation does the owner have to provide in order to recover the vehicle?

  • Documentation in the Swedish language proving the ownership and/or a power of attorney, if available.
  1. Are there any time limits associated with recovery of the vehicle? (i.e. after a certain period of time the vehicle becomes the property of the state or police, etc.)?
  • No.
  1. Please give details of relevant legislation
  • Through changed rules on July 1, 2003 in Swedish legislation relating to acquisition in good faith of personal property.

From July 1, 2003 it shall therefore no longer be possible to make acquisition in good faith of stolen goods and other unlawfully taken property or property that has been obtained through robbery. This means that the person that has been robbed of something shall have the right to have the property restored without having to pay anything, no matter whether the person that has acquired the property is in good faith or not.

At the same time, amendment is also made in the Code of Judicial Procedure relating to seizures in order to make it easier for an injured party to have seized property restored quicker.

  1. If the law in your country precludes the restitution of a stolen vehicle to its original owner, please give the reasons why
  • See paragraph 7.
  1. Does your country have any bilateral treaties, conventions, or agreements with other countries dealing with the recovery of stolen property? If so, please describe how they operate and give details of the countries concerned
  • No.
  1. Reference point, for assistance in case of difficulties
    Peter Ostgren, NCB Stockholm, Email
    or
    24-hours Desk phone +46 8 401 37 00

Last update : March 2007

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme