For years, concerns have been raised about the shortsighted approach to vehicle security.
A long-standing argument is that advancements in anti-theft technology have primarily deterred only opportunistic criminals, while more organised offenders have continued to operate with impunity.On February 24, 2025, Thatcham Research reaffirmed this overlooked consequence, stating:
- “Vehicle manufacturers have made significant strides in improving security over the past three decades, effectively shifting vehicle crime from low-level criminals to organised gangs.”
source
The dramatic drop in vehicle theft reports – often cited as an 80% or greater reduction – led many to believe the issue had been effectively addressed. This decline was met with widespread self-congratulation, as industry experts and policymakers pointed to enhanced security measures as a resounding success.
However, the reality was more complex. As some had warned, improved security measures merely “designed out” the disorganised and unskilled thieves – ‘quantity not quality’. The professional criminal networks, far from being eradicated, adapted and flourished in the absence of low-level offenders.
The introduction of sophisticated electronic security rendered old-fashioned theft methods -such as forcing an ignition lock – obsolete. While car key technology evolved, many petty criminals did not or could not keep up. As a result, only the more advanced, profit-driven offenders remained, operating with greater efficiency and lower risk.
The focus on reducing theft numbers, rather than understanding the evolving nature of vehicle crime, has left a crucial gap in strategy – one that organised crime groups have been all too ready to exploit.