Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

WMP Driving Down Car Thefts?

23/04/2025 – The West Midlands Police & Crime Commissioner (WMP&CC) post about ‘car’ thefts appears encouraging at first glance, yet closer examination raises questions due to mixed terminology and ambiguous details:

“Vehicles”: Operation Vantor aims to tackle “vehicle thefts,” but the term “vehicles” broadly includes anything from quad bikes and scooters to heavy plant machinery, as per DVLA classifications. Clarity on precisely what types of vehicles are involved (cars alone?) would enhance transparency.

“Cars”: When citing a 35% increase from 11,990 (2021) to 16,232 (2023) this is specified; “cars.” No other ‘vehicle’ categories?

“Car Crime”: A 10% reduction in ‘car crime’ potentially includes crimes like ‘theft from’ vehicles. Clarifying whether this reduction specifically relates to vehicle theft itself or a broader category would improve understanding of actual progress against theft.

Recovery of 300 Vehicles: The report mentions the recovery of 300 vehicles (average value £10,000) but does not specify the timeframe. If these recoveries occurred since May 2024, they represent approximately 2% of the annual car theft rate (around 15,000?). Furthermore, it remains unclear if these recovered vehicles originated from within West Midlands Police jurisdiction, thus leaving questions about the direct effectiveness of local measures.

This represents 100 more seizures, valued at £ 1.2 million since the 13/02/2025 post, which conveyed similar information.

However, it is unknown whether these recovered vehicles originated from within West Midlands Police jurisdiction, thus leaving questions about the direct effectiveness of local measures. 

Were these vehicles recovered as a whole, as-was pre-theft, or a collection of components? Whilst still representing a full value (total) loss, the victim in the same position as though the vehicle had not been found.  Are abandoned, burnt-out vehicles included within the figures?

Prosecutions: Silence on this aspect, which must surely be an important prevention/deterrent factor. The Birmingham press reported, 2023 ‘hardly any car thieves end up being caught’.

Possibly, manufacturers are still (inappropriately) the scapegoat for the conduct of the ‘professional’ and ‘organised’ party in this crime; those stealing vehicles?  

Given the significance of this issue, especially considering the West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner’s leadership in the 2019 Vehicle Crime Taskforce (which saw limited tangible outcomes), more precise and detailed information would better illustrate the true effectiveness of recent initiatives.

Standardised terminology and consistent crime recording or relevant information should be established nationwide.

Transparent reporting of theft methodologies, such as the extent of “security bypass,” would further enhance the credibility and value of such public statements.


A request for the information supporting the PCC Vehicle/Car Theft figures for 2023 & 2024 has been made of WMP and the WMP&CC.  The responses are awaited.


Note:

In 2023, WMP notified the DVLA of 13,464 LoS (lost or stolen) VRMs (vehicle registration marks), in 2024, the notifications had reduced by 620 to 12,844. These figures are for all vehicles and only represent those that reached the DVLA

Recent Posts:

  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme