Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

241224 NPCC FoIA Response re Vehicle Crime Unit

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NUMBER 385/2024

Request:

I understand that the NPCC, Lead for Vehicle Crime, has instigated, or is otherwise associated with, a new vehicle crime unit*.

Please provide all information available in respect of this, as well as notes and reports that gave rise to the intention to form the team, the composition of said team, their remit, the dates upon which they have met or are to meet, and if they have met, the composition of the meeting and the notes resulting from same.

*National Vehicle Crime Reduction Partnership (NVCRP)?

Response:

The NPCC does hold information captured by part of your request. Unfortunately, your request engages S14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act. You are seeking ‘all information available in respect of the National Vehicle Crime Reduction Partnership (NVCRP).

There are an excessive amount of emails and reports and other documents held by NaVCIS.

The amount of redaction will vary in each email / document depending on the nature of the emails / documents, the type and amount of information recorded will require to be considered on a case-by-case basis to include details of individuals and any operational details.

An authority cannot claim section 12 for the cost and effort associated with considering exemptions or redacting exempt information. Nonetheless, it may apply section 14(1) where it can make a case that the amount of time required to review and prepare the information or disclosure would impose a grossly oppressive burden to the NPCC. There is a high threshold for refusing a request on such grounds and this means that the NPCC is likely to have a viable case where:

You have asked for a substantial volume of information AND

  • •The NPCC has real concerns about potentially exempt information, which it will be able to substantiate if asked to do so by the ICO AND
  • Any potentially exempt information cannot easily be isolated because it is scattered throughout the requested material.

For further information relating to the legislation, please see Annex A (s.14 explanation highlighting ‘burden’).

The NPCC does not hold recorded information in relation to NVRCP meetings. At the time of your request, having consulted with colleagues, it is understood that no meetings had taken place.

In wishing to assist you, outside of the Act as a gesture of good will, I have provided a document held by NaVCIS titled NVCRP Key points and ToR scoping.

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme