Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

220303 Sussex Police Response to ICO

03/03/2022
From DPO@sussex.police.uk
To ICO Casework
Subject CIM.T1.22 ICO Case reference: IC-108170-P1J8

Dear David

Thank for your letter in response to the complaint raised by [redacted] I have extracted the relevant information to answer the questions below. Most of the responses have been directly lifted from the email exchanges (as attached), this is to validate the communications from the Collisions Unit to the data subject to re-enforce the current operational processes in place for such incidents.

  • Describe the procedure for handling incidents of this kind, and state whether the procedure was followed in this instance.
  • What was the purpose for the disclosure?
  • Why was the disclosure necessary for this purpose?

Where an incident that falls under Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 occurs and one of the parties has refused to give their contact details for insurance purposes, the aggrieved party will contact the police to provide the necessary data from the DVLA records. The information shared is the minimum required as required by the legislation to allow civil proceedings to be established.

In this scenario, the aggrieved party used the information to confront the data subject, this is a crime and will be investigated as such. The information shared with the data subject by the Collisions Unit made the purpose for the processing clear to the data subject:

With regards to your enquiry about your personal details being given. Under section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is a requirement that the names and addresses of the drivers involved in a damage only collision are exchanged.
Therefore you would have been required to do this at the scene although 1 understand from your explanation why this may not have been possible for you. As details were not exchanged and the collision was reported to ourselves by the other party, part of our role is to try to establish the details of the other driver.
Once these details have been established we are required under section 170 to pass these details onto both parties.
Should you be involved in a similar situation in the future and you are not able to exchange details at the scene then you should report the incident to the Police within 24 hours
Although you had stated that there was not a Road traffic accident or damage the other driver has reported the incident and advised that there is damage to their vehicle therefore section 170 applies and details are required to be exchanged

  • Please state if personal data is being processed under UK GDPR or part 3 DPA 2018.
  • If under UK GDPR, what Article 6 lawful basis did you use to disclose personal data?

Personal data was originally processed under the GDPR as processed by the DVLA. This was then further processed by the police for a law enforcement purpose. The initial processing by the DVLA would be Public Task as there is a requirement to process this data within their official functions. Due to the lawful requirement to make the disclosure under the Road Traffic Act, the information was further processed as it was compatible and necessary for the performance of a task carried out for that purpose by a competent authority. Under the data minimisation requirements, only the relevant and pertinent information was shared with the aggrieved party, this being sufficient to report the claim to their insurance company.

  • Please provide any further information you feel may be relevant to our assessment.

Whilst appreciative that this was a traumatic incident for the data subject, this process was established to ensure incidents involving damage to vehicles where a driver refuses to give their details can be resolved through insurance companies. This is also an established and required process for all Police Forces in agreement with the DVLA. Fortunately, this type of incident is an exception rather then the normal and any crimes committed against either party following the exchange of personal data will be fully investigated. Support will also be offered to the victims, as it was for

If you require any further information then please do not hesitate to contact me. Many thanks

Regards
Information Governance Supervisor
Force Deputy Data Protection Officer
Sussex Police Headquarters, Church Lane, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2DZ www.sussex.police.uk

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme