Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contacts
  • News
  • Interesting & Reference
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Collision & Crime Reports

A number of concerns & questions have arisen about constabularies approach to the disclosure of police reports/information.

Since 2022 it is apparent constabularies have been concerned about the use of Third Party (TP) SAR requests, in particular those made by insurers or their representatives on behalf of insured claimants, victims of crime. In some instances police disclosure units, rather than looking for ways to assist these victims, have taken an aggressive stance to disclose – alleged or inferred the commission of a criminal offence; ‘Enforced Subject Access’, contrary to section 184 of the Data Protection Act. More about this conduct can be read here

The requested reports generally fall to two types:

Preview

  1. Crime – about a vehicle theft or damage to a vehicle
  2. Collisions – following road traffic ‘accidents‘

Both have been the subject of attention over the past few years

Police Scotland information/charges can be read here.

Crime Reports

Since 2002, the process for requesting and receiving a crime report has operated under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), an agreement between insurers and the police. While this agreement aimed to streamline the process, the existence of multiple constabularies has led to variations in how the process is applied. Over time, it seems the document and process have evolved with limited updates or meaningful guidance, and the inclusion of a fee for obtaining a report may have led to concerns about the focus shifting from public assistance to revenue generation.

In cases where fraud is suspected, there have been observations that some involved in processing these requests may not have a full understanding of the relevant context.

Though not without its flaws, the 2002 version of the MoU was considered relatively functional. However, subsequent revisions have introduced complexities that contribute to delays. The most recent version, released in 2022, introduced additional challenges.

Another point to consider is that the process currently applies only to victims insured by members of the Association of British Insurers (ABI). This has raised questions about inclusivity. For example, Staffordshire Police will assist those who insure with an ABI member but not others. Read more here about selective disclosures.

There is however a concern that any criticism of the process could result in the police withdrawing the service altogether, rather than addressing ways to make it more accessible.

We have written on the subject of disclosing crime reports believing this is not as complicated as some believe. Indeed, a non-MoU process has bene established with a constabulary that substantially reduces the admin’ and their resource allocation.

It is important to note that the MoU is not the sole means by which crime reports can be obtained.

More about Police Crime Reports can be found here.

Collison Reports

With regard to collisions, for many, many years, acquiring police reports posed no problems for insurers or their representatives. However, a significant change occurred as a result of a 2021/2022 incident that caused some constabularies to simply ‘shut up shop’; they stopped disclosing information.

In the main, it appears the non-disclosure behaviour has now stopped, the issue overcome, but many police ‘services’ remain slow to provide reports:

  • Staffordshire has citing ‘unforeseen’ staffing issues (since 07/2023) for not releasing FoI responses and crime reports from 07/2023 to 09/2024! Read more here.
  • West Mercia was not issuing reports but it appears the situation has been reviewed and there are circumstances in which they can be released – read more here

The 2022 incident is detailed within these pages – obtaining the information in an attempt to understand the issue(s) was not easy, with a constabulary being particularly obstructive.

More about Police Collision Reports can be found here.

09/2024

Recent Posts:

  • Crime Reports – Copies of ‘Consent’
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme