Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Hungary

  1. Under what circumstances can a stolen vehicle be seized in your country?
  • The seizure of a thing and. ceasing the seizure of a thing in Hungary is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code (sect. 101 and 102).
    According to the new dispositions of this law a thing can be seized if it is a material proof, if it can be confiscated on the basis of other laws (provided by law n° LXXXVIII sect. 13 issued on 1998 applicable since March 1999) or if confiscation of property can be ordered relating to the concerned thing.
    Police or other competent authorities (customs) may seize things (including stolen vehicles) considering the a/m dispositions of our a/m Act. It includes the cases when a vehicle is searched because it was earlier stolen. The vehicles requested for- search through Interpol channels are included in our national stolen property index by our NCB. On the basis of our search these vehicles are seized by the local police forces by whom the vehicle is by chance checked
  1. What channels are used to notify the owner of the vehicle’s location (Interpol or other)?
  • The owners are usually notified through Interpol channels but it is often used their notification through the Hungarian representatives of foreign federations of insurance companies (this works especially when a vehicle has become the property of an insurance company)
  • If the victim has left details of where he can be contacted, the authority responsible for the investigation will contact him directly by mail or telephone. If the victim is a foreign national, he will be informed via Interpol or, in most cases, by the insurance company’s Hungarian representative.
  1. Who is responsible for the storage of seized vehicles?
  • According to our a/m law the seized thing is going to be left in safe custody. Responsible for the safekeeping of the vehicle is the private firm who is storing the vehicle or police / other authorities in case a vehicle is stored at penal parking lots.
  • The procedure for returning vehicles is as follows: the officer responsible for the case faxes an order to the pound terminating the seizure of the vehicle. Within two days, the vehicle is prepared for restitution to the owner, who has to identify himself and produce a copy of the order terminating the seizure.
  1. Are there any costs associated with storage of a seized stolen vehicle and who is responsible for these costs?
  • The costs of storage of a stolen vehicle are usually considered criminal expenses but exceptions are always existing.
  • If the vehicle has been found, the police are responsible for the costs of transportation, storage, maintenance and verification. If the owner does not collect the vehicle within two days of receipt of the order, he will be responsible for the storage costs for the subsequent days. If the owner does not take the necessary steps within the following 30 days, the vehicle is sold or destroyed. If the vehicle is sold, the proceeds are due to the owner, who may request payment.
  1. How does a stolen vehicle get restored to its legal owner?
    a) Do the police have authority to restore the vehicle?

-If the vehicle is being seized by police it is going to be restored by police. There are many cases when it is not cleared to whom the vehicle should be handed over. In these cases the competent prosecutor should decide in the question of restoring.

b) Is it the local court who authorises release of the vehicle?

–

c) Is it necessary to have a “commission rogatoire” to recover the vehicle?

  • To recover a stolen vehicle a commission rogatory is usually not needed, but exceptions are always existing (in cases prescribed by our law).

d) What documentation does the owner have to provide in order to recover the vehicle?

  • The documentation provided must prove the ownership of the owner. In case the vehicle is going to be recovered by an authorised agent he must be in possession of a power of attorney coming from the rightful owner (translated into Hungarian).
  • The appropriate authority terminates the seizure by an order. The owner must justify his claim to the property, for instance, by producing the original registration document. If the owner has been compensated by an insurance company, the vehicle will be returned to him subject to his signing a declaration that he will refund the compensation payment to the insurance company.
  1. Are there any time limits associated with recovery of the vehicle? (i.e. after a certain period of time the vehicle becomes the property of the state or police, etc.)?
  • A vehicle is usually kept under seizure until the costs of storage cover the value of the vehicle but the time limit can be also less. After that, the vehicle is going to be sold out. A decision in this matter comes within the competence of the prosecutor / law court. This question is provided in the section. 102/A of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  • When the seizure of a vehicle is terminated, the vehicle must be returned to the person who was its owner when the crime was committed. That person must prove beyond any doubt that he or she was the owner.

If there is no one to whom the vehicle must be returned, and no such reference is made in the provision above, the vehicle must be turned over to a person making a justified request. If no such person can be found, the vehicle must be returned to the person from whom it was seized. The vehicle can only be returned to the accused if, under the above provisions, it cannot be turned over to anyone else.

Even if it is certain that a vehicle seized from an accused person definitely belongs to somebody else, that vehicle will become State property if the true owner’s identity cannot be established. If the true owner subsequently comes forward, he or she can request restitution of the vehicle, within the time limit, or of the amount for which the vehicle was sold.

If the vehicle is worthless, and nobody claims it after the seizure procedure has been terminated, it must be destroyed.

  1. Please give details of relevant legislation
  • See point 1 and 6.
  1. If the law in your country precludes the restitution of a stolen vehicle to its original owner, please give the reasons why
  • According to the section 102/subs. (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code the seized thing should be handed over to the person who owned it at the time of the offence (for example at the time of the theft) It means that a seized stolen vehicle should be handed over to the damaged party. However in practice sometimes there are so many problems with the question of the “owner in good faiths”.
  1. Does your country have any bilateral treaties, conventions, or agreements with other countries dealing with the recovery of stolen property?
    -Hungary has adopted the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Strasbourg 20.04.1959) which was included into our internal legislation with the Act XIX of 1994. We also have bilateral conventions in this matter with 42 countries around the world which have been included too into our internal legislation.
  2. Reference point, for assistance in case of difficulties
  • Point of reference could be our NCB or the other usual channels.

Corporal-in-Chief Jozdef Toth (only for information as to whether the vehicle is in the pound). Telephone No.: 36-06-1-307-5208, mobile telephone No.: 06-209-466-529.

– The officer on whose initiative the vehicle was seized.

– If appropriate, insurance company representatives in Hungary, currently:
Zsuzsanna Majercsik
Repatria Budapest Ltd.
06-309-341-3131

Siba Edit
Klemm Karenyhito Ltd.
06-309-411-579.

Last update : May 2000

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme