Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contacts
  • News
  • Interesting & Reference
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

PNC LoS Report Weeding

Posted on November 30, 2024December 9, 2024 by 5@mwosb.co.uk

‘Weeding‘; the archaic process of automatically removing a Police National Computer (PNC) Lost or Stolen (LoS) marker against a vehicle registration mark (VRM) because someone failed to ‘confirm’ the stolen allegation within 6 weeks.

How many stolen vehicles have fallen foul of this process; are stolen but no longer recorded as such?

Gwent Constabulary appears to be the first to have heeded our concerns and ended the process (10/2024). Read more here.

Following our multiple issues with Surrey police, they too threw in the towel writing

  • ‘In relation to the policy concerning the confirming of Lost/Stolen vehicle reports on PNC, effective from 13th November, Surrey Police control rooms confirm lost/stolen vehicle reports at point of entry’.

12/2024, Merseyside police explained:

  • A LoS report will be added to the PNC after a report of theft of the vehicle has been received. There is guidance in the Manual as to when a LoS report should be added. The PNC Manual provides that a LoS report should be confirmed within 48 hours of the time of the theft. An unconfirmed LoS report will be delated after 6 weeks if not confirmed. There is a process to ensure that an unconfirmed Los report is brought to the attention of the inputting Force.

The above effectively confirms there is a potential problem which, to address, involves further action. But if constabulary staff acted appropriately and ‘confirmed’ reports within 48 hours, a ‘process’ would not be required to warn of imminent, or actual, automatic deletion. Pne constabulary described how they took a while to address the weeded items – there were so many!

How many vehicles, ‘reported’ stolen, are no longer ‘recorded’ stolen because of this archaic, unnecessary system?

  • How many people are driving stolen vehicles without knowing this
  • ANPR and PNC searches of such VRMs will return ‘clear’ (not stolen) because the stolen marker was weeded and never reinstated?
  • Vehicle Provenance companies providing vehicle data/history checks will return ‘not stolen’
  • Police recovery rates will be skewed; convey a higher than actual recovery rate

STOP WEEDING NOW!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts:

  • Crime Reports – Copies of ‘Consent’
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme