Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

190820 PCC Cars Most Likely to be Stolen in the West Midlands

20/08/2019 WMPCC post:

It’s emerged that drivers of Fords in the West Midlands are the most likely to have their cars stolen.

That’s according to figures published by the region’s Police and Crime Commissioner which names and shames the 20 worst performing manufacturers whose vehicles are most at risk of being stolen.

David Jamieson is angry at the apparent ease at which criminals are stealing cars and has promised to publish car theft data every six months so motorists can make informed decisions about which vehicles to buy based on the likelihood of them being stolen.

Mr Jamieson is especially concerned about the vulnerability of keyless vehicles.

So far in 2019, statistics show that Fords are the most popular car amongst thieves. The number of those stolen has risen from 489 in 2015 to 1,557 so far in 2019.

Even when you take that into account that Fords are the most popular car in the region, the level of thefts is disproportionately high.

Experts within West Midlands Police say that whilst keyless technology has made life more convenient for the motorist it is also making stealing vehicles more convenient for criminals.

The PCC’s data also reveals 432 Audi’s have been stolen so far this year, compared to 199 in 2015.

Similarly, Mercedes has also seen an increase in theft, rising from 114 in 2015 to 529 so far this year. 

The PCC took the decision to publish the statistics, despite opposition from motor manufacturers, after growing increasingly concerned that not enough was being done to make cars secure.

The statistics supplied to the Commissioner by West Midlands Police will continue to be published every 6 months until thefts return to the relatively low levels seen in 2015.

The PCC has been leading a national campaign calling on motor manufacturers to close security loopholes. Last year, he held a car theft summit and met with BMW, Honda, Ford, Nissan, Audi and Jaguar Land Rover to demand they do more to prevent cars from being taken by crooks.

The Home Office Vehicle Crime Taskforce also approached the PCC to work with it to tackle the issue.

There are early signs that manufacturers are listening to the public’s concerns and new technology is being rolled out to try and prevent thefts. However, it is not yet clear what affect it will have on the number of cars being stolen.

Consumer magazine What Car? recently reported that it is 90% faster to steal a keyless car than a car with old-fashioned locks and ignition. Keyless cars can be stolen in as little as 10 seconds.

What Car? tested the security of 7 different car models and found they were able to steal six of them using the same technology used by thieves. One of the cars could be stolen in only ten seconds.

The tests involved attempts to trick the keyless cars into thinking its key was closer than it really was.


The figures appear odd … a FoIA request for further information & clarification was made 24/08/2024


Recent Posts:

  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme