Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

240813 Update on NPCC PNC/LEDS Retention and Disposal Review

National Police Chiefs’ Council

Date: 13th August 2024

Dear Chief Constables
Update on NPCC PNC/LEDS Retention and Disposal Review

I wish to provide you with an update in respect of the review of retention and disposal policy for the Police National Computer (PNC) and Law Enforcement Data Service (LEDS), as I appreciate that some time has passed since my last communication.

I firstly wish to announce [remainder of paragraph redacted]

[commencement of paragraph redacted] which will culminate in us achieving our goal of implementing a new retention policy for the disposal records held on the PNC/LEDS.

As many of your staff will be aware the review has been very extensive, and over many years. It has involved consultation with all NPCC Forces, the NPCC portfolios for PNC/LEDS, Criminal Justice (C]), Information Management Boards, including the Data Board [redacted] Non-Home Office Police Forces, wider law enforcement agencies, His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS), the Ministry of Justice (MO]), the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), The Commissioners for Information (ICO), Biometrics and Surveillance Cameras, and Children, as well as [redacted]

Currently all records are held on PNC until a person is deemed to be 100 years of age, additionally there is NPCC guidance on the Deletion of Records from National Police Systems (PNC, National DNA Database (NDNAD) and National fingerprint system (Ident1)). The guidance allows data subjects with a PNC record to exercise their ‘Right of Erasure’ under ‘Data Protection’ legislation. All PNC records are eligible for review under this guidance, including arrest records and Police Cautions. Court Convictions are not eligible under the NPCC guidance in the absence of a formally agreed Controller position; however, it has been known that some Forces do dispose of Court Convictions on PNC. This has caused much consternation for the Judiciary and HMCTS, as there is no consistency or national standard that supports records retention and deletion on PNC data.

ACRO manage the application process on behalf of Forces, which allows Chief Constables (or their Designated Chief Officer) to use their discretion when deleting information from PNC. As a minimum this review seeks to maintain the status quo, which includes the disposal of Police Cautions.

During the review the principles of the Management of Police Information (MoPI) were applied to PNC and a proposed set of rules was circulated to Forces and other stakeholders that use PNC, asking them to complete consultation feedback questionnaires. The proposed rules were amended following that feedback. One of the key elements was the increase of the 100 years of age rule to 120 years of age, following operational feedback from both Forces and Partner Agencies.

There has been a significant delay since the original consultation, and the signing of any retention and disposal policy. This is due to the strong views presented by HMCTS and [redacted] that have required further consideration.

Whilst our Criminal Justice Partners are accepting of the Police having a Review, Retention and Disposal (RRD) policy for PNC and LEDS, they do not support the disposal of Court Convictions or Police Cautions. The police currently undertake Police Caution disposals under the NPCC guidance, which the HMCTS/MOJ accept is within our remit. This has resulted in ongoing discussions about who the Controllers are for Court Convictions.


HMCTS are of the view that PNC (and eventually LEDS) should be a Comprehensive Register of Convictions, and that Article 10 of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) should be invoked, with the Police maintaining PNC and LEDS in their capacity as an Official Authority. This would likely require a change in legislation.

In the meantime, ongoing discussions between the NPCC, HMCTS and the ICO are focussing on who the Controllers are of Court Convictions. HMCTS reluctantly accept that the Police are the sole Controllers of Police Cautions, questioning why they cannot be retained to allow for appropriate sentencing.

We are now at the point that we have a proposed set of retention and disposal rules that meet the needs of the Police and their partners. The only outstanding issue is around Court Convictions, where there are two options.

  • All Court Convictions are retained until a person is deemed to be 120 years of age.
  • There is no automated disposal of Court Convictions before 120 years of age, but Forces can dispose of them following a manual review.

We aim to have an agreed policy by the end of 2024 and are already working on the technical design for LEDS. Should PNC still be in existence when the solution is available two-way replication will ensure that records are disposed of from both systems.


In addition to a new retention and disposal policy the NPCC deletion guidance and Authorised Professional Practice (APP) on Information Management will also be updated, ensuring that Forces can apply a standard and consistent approach to carrying out reviews.


We will provide a further update in due course, however, should you have any queries then please contact: [redacted]

I thank you for your continued patience.
Kind regards,

[redacted]

Nav Malik
Deputy Chief Constable
NPCC Lead for Police National Computer and LEDS.
NPCC PNC/LEDS Retention and Disposal Review

Original source document

Recent Posts:

  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme