Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

Vehicle Theft Prevention

If you have it, they may come.  Vehicle theft is low priority for constabularies.  The number of vehicles found has reduced.  Of those located, many are not found ‘as was’ but little more than a shell.

  1. Disable Keyless Entry: Some vehicles allow you to turn off the wireless signal feature, which prevents the doors from unlocking automatically when you approach the car. You can still use the remote, which requires you to press a button – barely a hardship!
  • Use a Faraday Case: Wrap your key fob in a Faraday case.  Apparently, these prevent the keyless feature (above).  So why not undertake ‘1’ or keep keys a good distance from the vehicle and permitter of your home
  • Do not leave keys in or about the car:  Firstly, you could well negate a claim upon your insurance policy – the thief gets everything, you get nothing. Secondly, and a reason an insurer may not entertain a claim; it is a substantial risk – defeating the object of vehicle security!
  • Physical Locking: This will likely prevent casual thieves who wander the streets trying vehicle and house door handles in the hope of one giving to their force but see ‘1’ and ‘2’ above … it is called ‘keyless theft’ for a reason.
  • Items of value: If on display, they may be too tempting to resist.  Keep the vehicle neat, clear of personal items.
  • Fit a steering lock or wheel clamp: Will these (anything) deter the determined?  What about some form of cut out (‘kill’) switch?
  • Reprogram your keys: Having acquired a car, take it to a dealer and ask them to reprogram your keys.  If any other keys exist, these will fit the mechanical locks, but otherwise, not operate the vehicle.
  • Park near to your home, behind gates, in a garage – if you have the luxury of such facilities.  Oh … and do not tell an insurer your vehicle is garaged overnight if you do not have a one!
  • Fit a tracker: Despite all you hear about ‘security bypass’, ‘keyless entry’ and manufacturers are to blame, many vehicles are still taken with keys or uplifted, and manufacturers can only do so much.  You obviously want/need to enter and drive your vehicle, so do criminals.  They will employ the same process as you if they can – gain whatever device overcomes the security.

Tracking

Consider a tracking product that also provides a recovery facility – otherwise, in furtherance of the police interest, you may have to find and snatch the vehicle back yourself!

Think about the features you want, the alerts required, for example:

  • Moving without a key
  • Geo-tagging – an alert if the vehicle moves beyond a specified boundary
  • Time zones – movement during specific periods, possibly coupled with a boundary alert
  • Interference – notifications if the kit is tampered with or the signal is affected
  • Errors – alerts if the system returns an ‘odd’ signal i.e. at a location impossibly distant from a previous signal

Also consider:

  • Do you require access to the information the device is returning
  • Would extra features, such as telematics data be helpful?

Not all tracking devices and companies are created equal.

Recent Posts:

  • 10. The Power Imbalance
  • 9. Trackers Do More Than Recover Cars
  • 8. The Theft to Recovery Timeline
  • 7. Investigation – Insurers vs. Police
  • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
  • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
  • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
  • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
  • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
  • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
  • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
  • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme