Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

Unavailable Information – it is not in a ‘Readily Retrievable Format.’

Knowledge is power, information is imperative. Yet despite, for example, the 2019 Vehicle Crimes Taskforce (VCT) identifying the need for better information about vehicle taking methodologies, even the ‘spearheading’ West Midlands Police can shed no light on how many (if any) vehicles reported to them as ‘stolen’ were taken by keyless methodologies*.

No information, no indication of the resource requirement, no idea whether this is the issue presented.

Indeed, as the increase in vehicle taking appears to be the result of law enforcement inactivity as opposed to manufacturer failings, possibly ‘security bypass’ or ‘electronic compromise’ is a constabulary gift; an excuse to do little or nothing, replacing the previous ‘fishing rod’ taking methodology? Criminals are the organised & professional facet of the vehicle taking environment – what are the police expected to do … other than dish out a crime number in the belief this will result in an insurer paying compensation, bringing closure to thematter?

*clearly this is a problem, but one that appears

General Lack of Data


03/2025 Warwickshire police response to a request for PNC LoS Markers Against VRMs for 2023 & 2024:

It has been determined that not all of the requested information is held in a readily retrievable format. In order to provide a response in relation to the type of vehicle stolen, whether the vehicles were recovered, if so the month of recovery and the age of the vehicle, it would be necessary to manually review each and offence relating to theft of a motor vehicle recorded in 2023 and 2024. This would involve thousands of records and; therefore, the work involved in locating, retrieving and recording the information requested would exceed the cost threshold (£450), which equates to 18 hours work at a standard rate of £25 per hour, as stated in the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004.

The system in which the information/data is held/extracted: Athena.


04/2025 Gloucestershire Constabulary PNC LoS Markers for VRMs 2023 & 2024

I am unable to provide the data in an excel spreadsheet due to the way the data is recorded and the extraction techniques utilised by other areas of the organisation. I order to provide the data contained within the response to you much manipulation of multiple data sets was required. If you require this to be contained within an excel spreadsheet you can copy and paste the tables provided.

We originally exempted the VRM under the section 40 however on review we could potentially provide letters 3 & 4 however this would be uncorrelated data and would not be linked to the make and model. The data could also be
incomplete as the field which is populated with the VRM is a non-mandatory free text field.

The system we use is UNIFI, Gloucestershire Constabulary is not using Niche currently.

We are unable to extract data from PNC as this is a standalone system administered by a third party.
Gloucestershire Constabulary does monitor crime levels over multiple crime types, however the data utilised is high level unless a trend is identified which requires further investigation.

Recent Posts:

  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme