Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Crime Offence Codes, Data Sets & Anomalies

DVLA Records

It may be reasonable to assume that the DVLA would hold the most comprehensive records relating to vehicle ‘taking’ – that vehicles reported stolen to the police would see their Vehicle Registration Mark (VRM) passed to the DVLA who would record the ‘stolen’ status and therefore have the most accurate information. But no …

The DVLA does not receive every stolen record, so its information will always understate the actual position. This is explained in more detail here.

Police / Home Office

Do the HOME OFFICE codes/recording provide an accurate picture of UK vehicle theft?

A number of offence codes are associated ‘taking’ and ‘theft’ of a vehicle. However, ‘taking’ and ‘theft’ are not, in themselves, differentiated.

Home Office crime codes:

  • 48 – vehicle reported ‘stolen’
  • 53 – vehicle taken by fraud
  • 28 – vehicles taken by burglary
  • 34 – vehicle taken by robbery*.

*Albeit my understanding that technically it is not possible to ‘rob’ a motor vehicle. However, I assume that its keys and contents would fall to such an offence and may give rise to categorization of robbery associated with these elements.

Note

  • If multiple offences occur within one occurrence, the most serious offence is used to record the crime.
  • Offence codes 28 and 34, do not relate solely to vehicle crime. A stolen vehicle may have been used in the commission of the offence, rather than being stolen as a result of the offence.
  • The count of vehicles for offence code 28 can be higher than the occurrences because more than one vehicle can be stolen in each occurrence.
  • The count of vehicles for offence code 48 can be lower than the count of occurrences because not all occurrences contain details of the recorded vehicle with the vehicle fields.
    (source)

More about Police ‘Taken’ Data – The Missing or Confusing Records.

Fraud

Concerning offence code ’53’, it does not appear these offences fall to ‘taking/theft’.

When asked for the number of vehicles taken by fraud reported to a constabulary (Home Office code 53), no information was held. It was explained,:

Action Fraud is the UK’s national reporting centre for fraud and cyber-crime.
In the vast majority of cases, reports of fraud are completed via the Action Fraud website or Action Fraud call centre.
All cases of fraud, whether reported directly by the victim or referred by the Police, are recorded centrally via Action Fraud and analysed within the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) hosted by the City of London Police as the lead force.

More about Fraud ‘Taken’ Records – How & Where Recorded?

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme