Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

DVLA ‘Taken’ Data – The Missing Records

DVLA ‘stolen’ data conveys a record of ‘Lost or Stolen’ (LoS) reports transferred from the Police National Computer (PNC). 

Not every police LoS allegation/record reaches the DVLA.

Some of the reasons for this are as follows:

  • Recovered Before the Theft is Reported, for example:

11pm Friday, a vehicle is left locked secured and unattended. 3 hours later:
2am Saturday, the vehicle is taken without authority. An hour later:
3am Saturday, the police give chase to the vehicle which comes to a stop, occupants decamp. A PNC check of the vehicle reveals nothing untoward but a call is made to the vehicle keeper. Half an hour later:
3:30am Saturday, the keeper is awoken by the police, and looks outside. Their vehicle is no longer present.
The crime of taking is recorded but there is no point in adding the VRM to the PNC LoS register; it has been found, the LoS annotation on the PNC would need to be removed immediately

  • Recovered before the LoS entry reaches the DVLA, for example:

11pm Friday, a vehicle is left locked secured and unattended. 3 hours later:
2am Saturday, the vehicle is taken without authority, the owner is awoken, notes the activity and reports the taking without consent. 15 minutes later:
2:15am Saturday, the police add the VRM to the PNC LoS register
3am Saturday, the police give chase to the vehicle which comes to a stop, occupants decamp. A PNC check of the vehicle reveals the LoS marker
3:15am Saturday, the police, having recovered the vehicle, remove the PNC LoS marker from the VRM

The transfer of PNC LoS markers to the DVLA does occur not in real-time.

7am Saturday, the new LoS markers are transferred to the DVLA. By this time, the subject vehicle (above) has seen the LoS marker be recorded against the VRM and removed. At the time of transfer, the LoS marker is gone – no record is transferred.

• Recovered Before the LoS is ‘Confirmed’

11pm Friday, a vehicle is left locked secured and unattended. 3 hours later:
2am Saturday, the vehicle is taken without authority, the owner is awoken, notes the activity and reports the taking without consent. 15 minutes later:
2:15am Saturday, the police add the VRM to the PNC LoS register

The vehicle is not found.

The LoS marker is present on the PNC but the DVLA has not been updated. The LoS status is not conveyed to the DVLA because the police have not ‘confirmed‘ the crime – see ‘confirming LoS reports’ (below).

The crime should be confirmed within 48 hours of reporting. However, if the vehicle is found within its period and removed from the PNC LoS register, no data will be sent to the DVLA – as per ‘Recovered before the LoS entry reaches the DVLA’ (above).

After 2 weeks, if the police have not confirmed the crime, they are sent a reminder i.e this occurs – it could be a fortnight before the DVLA are notified of the LoS status. In the interim the vehicle could be found, the PNC LoS marker removed and the DVLA would be none the wiser about the ‘taking’ history.

After 6 weeks the report will be deleted if not confirmed. I have encountered occasions when vehicles taken without authority have been overlooked by the police, not confirmed within 6 weeks – during which time, if found, the status would never reach the DVLA.

Some unrecovered vehicles have been weeded at 6 weeks – they are removed from the PNC LoS register due to police oversight; a failure to ‘confirm’ the crime. No longer on the PNC LoS register, they never transfer to the DVLA.

‘Confirming’ LoS Reports

Police National Computer (PNC) User Manual version 21.01


9.4. Confirmation of LOS Reports

It is important that a LOS report is confirmed within 48 hours of the time of report of theft, because until the report is confirmed the DVLA at Swansea are not notified of the theft.

  • Any activity on the DVLA record of the vehicle in question would not be referred to the police for investigation during this time.

However, Experian, HPI, Retainagroup, Vehicle Information Services, NaVCIS and Interpol are informed of unconfirmed reports.

9.5. Reminders and Weeding of Unconfirmed LOS reports

For an unconfirmed LOS report, PNC Operations will issue a reminder 2 weeks after the date of the online entry and the report will be deleted after 6 weeks if not confirmed.

9.6. Reminders and Weeding of Confirmed LOS reports

After a LOS report has been confirmed, the entry will remain on the application for 6 years from the date of the original input, unless the vehicle is recovered. After this time the report is deleted.

Forces are notified of impending deletion one month in advance. If a force wishes the entry to remain on the system beyond this period, a fresh entry of the original details is required. It is recommended that this is done selectively, rather than routinely for all vehicles, following a review of the individual circumstances.

9.7. DVLA Actions

When PNC notifies the DVLA of the theft of a vehicle (confirmed LOS reports only) the Force/Station Code of the owner of the LOS report is included in the notification.

Any subsequent licensing or change of keeper transaction for that vehicle will result in a Report for Further Action (RFA – forms CL07 and VQ13) being sent
by the DVLA to the force owning the report, for investigation.

Incomplete Records

More about LoS records, the anomalies in recording and the lack of accurate, specific information can be found here:

  • Police ‘Taken’ Data – The Missing or Confusing Records
  • Fraud ‘Taken’ Records – How & Where Recorded?

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme