Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

DVLA ‘Taken’ Data – The Missing Records

DVLA ‘stolen’ data conveys a record of ‘Lost or Stolen’ (LoS) reports transferred from the Police National Computer (PNC). 

Not every police LoS allegation/record reaches the DVLA. Some of the reasons for this are as follows:

The DVLA receives a file daily, Monday to Friday, from the Police National Computer’s Lost or Stolen (LoS)
Register of stolen or recovered vehicles. This file is processed via an overnight batch run.

  • Recovered Before the Theft is Reported, for example:

10 am Monday, a vehicle is left locked secured and unattended. 3 hours later:
1 pm Monday, the vehicle is taken without authority. An hour later:
2 pm Monday, the police give chase to the vehicle which comes to a stop, and the occupants decamp. A PNC check of the vehicle reveals nothing untoward, but a call is made to the vehicle’s keeper. Half an hour later:
2:30 pm Monday, the keeper is contacted by the police, checks where they theft the vehicle – which is no longer present.
The crime of taking is recorded, but there is no point in adding the VRM to the PNC LoS register; it has been found. The LoS annotation on the PNC would need to be removed immediately if added.

  • Recovered before the LoS entry reaches the DVLA, for example:

10 am Monday, a vehicle is left locked, secured and unattended. 3 hours later:
1 pm Monday, the vehicle is taken without authority. An hour later:
2 pm Monday, the owner notices their vehicle is missing; it has been taken without consent. 15 minutes later:
2:15 pm Monday, the police add the VRM to the PNC LoS register
4 pm Monday, the police find the vehicle
4:30 pm, the police, having recovered the vehicle, remove the PNC LoS marker from the VRM

The transfer of LoS data to the DVLA occurs in an ‘overnight run’ i.e. after 4:30pm. Therefore, the PNC LoS entry has gone on and off the register bfore the data transfer.

The transfer of PNC LoS markers to the DVLA does not occur in real-time.

Note: the overnight processing occurs on weekdays. Therefore, a PNC LoS register entry that occurs AFTER the Friday overnight batch run will not transfer to the DVLA until Monday’s overnight batch run i.e. for most of Saturday, all of Sunday and much of Monday (almost 72 hours/3 days) the DVLA will be unaware of the VRM’s LoS status.

But does it matter whether the DVLA are notified of the PNC LoS register entry?

What does the PNC Manual say about confirming LoS reports? Read more here.

Incomplete Records

More about LoS records, the anomalies in recording and the lack of accurate, specific information can be found here:

  • Police ‘Taken’ Data – The Missing or Confusing Records
  • Fraud ‘Taken’ Records – How & Where Recorded?

Recent Posts:

  • When ‘Many Requests’ may not mean ‘Many Requests’
  • Home Office Records Reveal NaVCIS Was “Working Month to Month”
  • Inside the NPCC’s FoI Referral Unit
  • 13. What Better Practice Would Look Like
  • Stolen in Britain, Sold Abroad
  • 12. The Low Cost Check That May Save £1,000’s
  • 11. Good Faith Is Not Enough
  • 10. The Power Imbalance
  • Collaboration or Endorsement? A Closer Look at NVCRP Engagement
  • 9. Trackers Do More Than Recover Cars
  • 8. The Theft to Recovery Timeline
  • 7. Investigation – Insurers vs. Police
  • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
  • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
  • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
  • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
  • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
  • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
  • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
  • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme