Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

West Midlands Police & Security Bypass / Keyless Taking Information

Passed from pillar to post, it appears statements made by WMP and their crime commissioner were unsupportable, based on ‘gut feeling’.

an approach was made to WMP about a statement their Police & Crime commissioner made:

  • ‘The introduction of keyless technology has also led to the dramatic increase’ & use of ‘technology to get around the onboard electronic security systems, such as copying digital keys or using devices to stop a car from locking’
  • as you appear not to record the theft methodology, how has this statement justified?

18/07/2022, deemed not to be a valid request for information, WMP did add,

However, in order to assist, I can advise that as the statement was not made by WMP we would be unable to fulfil this enquiry should you submit it as a new request.

This appeared odd, inconsistent with online statements. Therefore, the matter was represented, rephrased:

  • Please provide the information giving rise to the statement:
  • ‘The introduction of keyless technology has also led to the dramatic increase’ & use of ‘technology to get around the onboard electronic security systems, such as copying digital keys or using devices to stop a car from locking’

By way of assistance, the above was accompanied by the explanation WMP’s Crime Commissioner did not hold the information and referred me to WMP, who appeared to be their source, as was explained:

  • I am aware the statement originates from the West Midlands Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner. Having approached your PCC, 16/06/2022 about the above statement they responded:
    • ‘This view is information West Midlands Police may hold and has advised the Police and Crime Commissioner on. In order to be of assistance, please see the following contact details should you wish to submit this question to West Midlands Police’

26/07/2022, the WMP&CC was approached again:

WMPCC Reference: 2020-00255

I am seeking an IR. I again ask the source of your statement;

  • ‘The introduction of keyless technology has also led to the dramatic increase’ & use of ‘technology to get around the onboard electronic security systems, such as copying digital keys or using devices to stop a car from locking’

WMP appear to have no knowledge of it – please see: whatdotheyknow.com

10/08/2022 further clarification was provided to WMP:

  • I note statements attributed to WMP: www.independent.co.uk & news.sky.com such as:
    • “They’re [thieves] using devices in order to block signals where people are trying to lock their cars with their fobs,” he said.
  • I am seeking the information linked to the methodology, that supports the above statement and similar. I remain at a loss to understand how the above is considered accurate if, as appears to be the case, WMP do not record the theft means and is unable to provide information to me about this.

[Superintendent Jim Munro from West Midlands Police warned drivers to stay vigilant. “They’re [thieves] using devices in order to block signals where people are trying to lock their cars with their fobs”.

17/08/2022, WMP responded:

  • It is unclear from your e-mail correspondence below what it is that you require from the FOI Unit.
  • Should you wish to submit a FOI request, please advise what specific recorded information it is that you require and also the time parameters that your request covers.
  • Please note that, as previously advised, the FOI Unit will not cross reference links, articles, documents and/or previous requests to try and interpret what an applicant is asking for.
  • I hope that this is of assistance. No further action has been taken

20/08/2022, to WMP:

  • Superintendent Jim Munro from West Midlands Police said:
  • “”They’re [thieves] using devices in order to block signals where people are trying to lock their cars with their fobs,”
  • What information does WMP possess to support this?
  • What percentage of thefts are taken by this means?
  • Kindly supply this information, the material used to support such a statement (or similar).

20/08/2022, WMP responded:

Please would you provide a time frame for question 2 of your request.

31/08/2022, to WMP in response:

Whilst i thank you for your acknowledgement, the time frame cannot be known to me as the statement is that of Superintendent Jim Munro from West Midlands Police:

“They’re [thieves] using devices in order to block signals where people are trying to lock their cars with their fobs,”


I have asked to be supplied, with the material used to support such a statement (or similar). I cannot know when it applies but assume it to be recent i.e. within the past year.
Therefore, the time frame appears an irrelevant aspect, which will be disclosed in the response, the past 5 years should cover the recent statements (above).

08/09/2022 WMP response:

FOI Request Reference: 1145A

Thank you for your request for information, received 20/08/22 and clarified on 31/08/22

REQUEST
Superintendent Jim Munro from West Midlands Police said:

“”They’re [thieves] using devices in order to block signals where people are trying to lock their cars with their fobs,” .

Kindly supply this information, the material used to support such a statement (or similar).

1• What information does WMP possess to support this?

RESPONSE

There is no specific recorded information held that we can supply to you in a material format however, in order to assist, we can advise that the statement was supported by the recovery of devices following arrests and information provided to, or known by, the police.

2• What percentage of thefts are taken by this means?

RESPONSE

No specific recorded information held.

The full exchange, the pulling of teeth to extract information can be found at WhatDoTheyKnow.com

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme