Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

250716 S.184 West Midlands Police Apology

From: WMP Force Information Management Lead
Sent: 16 July 2025 15:01
To: PSD Complaints PS_COMPLAINTS@westmidlands.police.uk
Cc: [subject]
Subject: [subject] complaint to WMP

Good afternoon PSD,

CC: [subject], the complainant.

I have had a telephone conversation with [the subject] today in which he expressed deep dissatisfaction with the way West Midlands Police have handled his recent complaint.

After the call, I can understand [the subject’s] frustrations so in order for there to be a proper resolution, I have broken down the complaint into two areas:

  1. Poor service from the information management team
    a. Incorrect use of legislation
    b. Accusations he is forcing people to make subject access requests
  2. Dissatisfaction with the approach the organisation take to requests from companies like his [company] when they are trying to obtain data from the police force in relation to insurance claims they are handling

To address point 1:

I have today formally apologised to [the subject] for the poor service he has had from IM. The delays in communicating with him were unacceptable, and beyond that, a member of staff who emailed [the company] accusing them of enforced SARs did so without just cause. Not only that, but they quoted the wrong legislation, adding further confusion to an already emotive interaction.

I have provided feedback to this member of staff that in no uncertain terms should this repeat again, and have educated them on the correct part of the legislation to use – as long as it is the appropriate time to do so.

To address point 2:

This is the part of [the subject’s] complaint that it is right to say will have to be escalated to the ICO. I emailed them some months ago (as sent to [the subject] via email upon his request) and he informed me today the case has now been allocated to a handler within the ICO – so I am hopefully we will have guidance from the ICO which will help both our organisation and [the company].

I trust this is useful – please can you add this to [the subject’s] complaint and again, [the subject], I do sincerely apologise for the poor service you have had from Information Management.

Kind regards
[redacted]

Force Information Management Lead
Data Protection Officer | Freedom of Information Unit Manager
Information Management
West Midlands Police

Recent Posts:

  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme