Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

240116 Thames Valley Police ‘4 Options’

16/01/2024 TVP’s response for a request relating to the disclosure of police reports:

Contents

The request:

The information sought is

  1. The 4 options with any accompanying explanation, advice, guidance (or similar) provided to the requestor
  2. The date this disclosure procedure commenced
  3. Any guidance/instruction or similar provided to TVP staff about the procedure
  4. Any disclosure of the process, for example, to the insurance industry
  5. The consideration TVP gave to the disclosure that resulted in the ‘4 options’ procedure.

Response

“Subject access request”

under section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998

Your client can request personal information relating to him or her by this process. Full details and an
application form can be downloaded from our website at:

Application for access to your personal data held on Thames Valley Police Information Systems

However, you will be aware that on a subject access request, information relating to other people has to be considered separately and may well be removed from any documents provided to your client. Depending on the purposes for which your client needs the documents, this may make them unsuitable for use in civil proceedings.

Consent

If you can provide the written consent of a person who has provided information to the police, we would
normally agree to provide that information to you. There may be some limited exceptions, for example,
where we consider that providing the information would be likely to prejudice an ongoing criminal
investigation or prosecution.

Court order

Subject to the following conditions, we would not normally object to an application for a court order requiring us to disclose information for the purposes of civil proceedings:

The conditions are as follows:

  • The application should set out precisely what information is sought and this should be limited
    to the evidential material gathered by the police, eg. Witness statements; records of interview;
    experts’ reports and documentary exhibits. It is most unlikely that we can agree to or comply with an
    order expressed in general terms, e.g. “all material” or “the file”.
  • The order should make provision for the payment of our reasonable costs and expenses in complying with it (these will be charged by us in accordance with the schedule enclosed with this
    letter).
  • The order should give us a reasonable time (normally 28 days) to provide the information requested. The order should be provided to us as soon as possible after it is made.

Interview of Attending Officer

    The reporting officer can be interviewed by a solicitor/insurance company only if civil proceedings are
    commenced
    and the interview is necessary to obtain proof of evidence. The interview will be granted on the strict understanding that a copy of the proof will be supplied to the Chief Constable, who may, at their discretion and to avoid unnecessary interviews, provide a copy of it to other solicitors, who are
    legitimate enquirers in any proceedings arising from the collision.

    If an interview with the officer concerned is allowed by the Chief Constable, a scale of charges commencing at £169.90 for the first two hours and £84.95 per hour / part hour thereafter will be charged. The charges apply in respect of each interview arranged, unless adequate notice of any postponement of the interview is received.

    No Police Officer will be allowed to give evidence in civil proceedings unless served with a subpoena.


    2-5.

    • 2. The date this disclosure procedure commenced
    • 3. Any guidance/instruction or similar provided to TVP staff about the procedure
    • 4. Any disclosure of the process, for example, to the insurance industry
    • 5. The consideration TVP gave to the disclosure that resulted in the ‘4 options’ procedure.

    No information held.

    The four options listed are not considered to be a procedure.

    Recent Posts:

    • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
    • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
    • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
    • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
    • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
    • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
    • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
    • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
    • The ICO – running out of time?
    • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
    • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
    • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
    • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
    • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
    • £50 for a Police Report Update?
    • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
    • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
    • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
    • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
    • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
    • Accusations of Criminality
    • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
    • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
    • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
    • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
    • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
    • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
    • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
    • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
    • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
    • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
    • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
    • Accuracy & Consistency Required
    • Do we need new legislation?
    • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
    • Which? … What?
    • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
    • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
    • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
    • The Devalued Crime Report
    • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
    • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
    • Vehicle Repatriation
    • Crime Number Devaluation
    • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
    • PNC LoS Report Weeding
    • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
    • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
    • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
    • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
    • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
    • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
    • Police Theft Report Disclosure

    Legal Disclaimer
    The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

    No Legal Advice
    Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

    No Liability
    We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

    External Links & Third-Party Content
    Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

    User Responsibility
    It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

    By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

    © 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme