Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018

Posted on February 15, 2026February 15, 2026 by 5@mwosb.co.uk

What is an “Enforced Subject Access Request”?

Section 184 of the Data Protection Act 2018 creates a criminal offence known as “enforced subject access.”

It is occasionally misunderstood.

What Section 184 Actually Does

Section 184 makes it an offence for a person to:

  • require another individual
  • to make a Subject Access Request (SAR)
  • and provide the results
  • where the information sought is a “relevant record.”

A “relevant record” is narrowly defined as:

  • A health record
  • A record relating to criminal convictions or cautions
  • Information obtained through a statutory function relating to such records

Both elements must be present:

  1. There must be a requirement (i.e. compulsion or coercion); and
  2. The information must be a “relevant record”.

If either element is absent, Section 184 is not engaged.


What Section 184 Does Not Do

Section 184:

  • Is not a general prohibition on third-party SARs
  • Does not prevent individuals from authorising representatives
  • Does not apply to ordinary personal data
  • Does not apply simply because disclosure may assist a contractual relationship

The ICO has consistently indicated that voluntary authorisation by a data subject does not amount to “enforced subject access”.


Third-Party Subject Access Requests

Under UK GDPR Article 15 and Part 3 of the DPA 2018:

  • A data subject may authorise another person to act on their behalf
  • The controller must verify identity and authority
  • Lawful redaction may be applied where appropriate

There is no statutory requirement that the representative be “independent” or “impartial”.


Why This Matters

Section 184 was introduced to prevent employers or others from forcing individuals to obtain and disclose sensitive criminal or health records.

It was not designed to restrict voluntary exercises of statutory access rights.

Where misapplied, Section 184 can:

  • Create unnecessary barriers to lawful access
  • Generate regulatory disputes
  • Cause delay and uncertainty

Clarity in interpretation benefits:

  • Data subjects
  • Public authorities
  • Representatives
  • Regulators

Current exchanges with Essex police and the ICO about TP SARs and s.184 can be found here. This page will be updated as regulatory consideration progresses.

West Midlands Police conduct & apology can be found here. This page will be updated as regulatory consideration progresses.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts:

  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme