Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

Preliminary National Indicators of Potential Weeding Impact

This is difficult to determine because we do not receive every theft notification and the UK’s LoS data is poor. There are several caveats to consider – read more here.

However, if the Home Office data is used to determine PNC notifications in a (financial) year and compared with the DVLA LoS ‘receipts’ for a (calendar) year, which is far from ideal, an indication can be determined.  The following DVLA VEHICLE data has been reviewed:

  • PSNI & Scottish constabularies have been excluded.  Whilst the DVLA disclosure includes these constabularies, the Home Office (H.O.) data does not, it relates to England & Wales.
  • The DVLA’s ‘not known’ constabulary category has been removed – the DVLA hold 1,415 such records for 2024.
  • The NCA (1 record) and NaVCIS (651 records) data have been removed – the H.O. Data does not include reference to these organisations.

A total of 44 constabularies data was reviewed; their Home Office records compared to the number of submissions the DVLA received from each in 2024.

The time periods used by each does not make for straightforward comparison however, the figures can be found here: 2024 LoS Submissions – Car Crime U.K.

In 2024, the DVLA received 95,589 ‘stolen’ vehicle notifications.

The Home Office statistics for the financial years, 2022/23, 2023/24 & 2024/25 convey an average of 126,810 vehicle theft reports.

DVLA totals are 32.66% lower than the Home Office totals (DVLA-denominator framing) i.e., Home Office totals are ~24.6% higher than DVLA totals.

The data for each constabulary was then considered to determine whether the 1/3rd difference was common – which could suggest a shared, consistent or plausible explanation for the anomaly.  However, the variation, the difference between Home Office data and that supplied to the DVLA provided widely differing figures:

  • Warwickshire police was the only constabulary whose LoS notifications to the DVLA exceeded those recorded by the Home Office.

Those with a discrepancy that exceeded 100% were:

 DVLA 2024H.O. averagedifference% difference
Merseyside Police1,0182,4901,472144.56%
Gwent Police3751,051676180.27%
Cleveland Police3651,074709194.34%
North Wales Police141418277196.69%
City of London Police113524218.18%
British Transport Police130528398305.90%

Recent Posts:

  • 13. What Better Practice Would Look Like
  • Stolen in Britain, Sold Abroad
  • 12. The Low Cost Check That May Save £1,000’s
  • 11. Good Faith Is Not Enough
  • 10. The Power Imbalance
  • Collaboration or Endorsement? A Closer Look at NVCRP Engagement
  • 9. Trackers Do More Than Recover Cars
  • 8. The Theft to Recovery Timeline
  • 7. Investigation – Insurers vs. Police
  • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
  • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
  • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
  • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
  • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
  • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
  • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
  • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme