Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contact Emails
  • News
  • Links
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

Austria

  1. Under what circumstances can a stolen vehicle be seized in your country?
    (a) When the vehicle was obviously stolen or misappropriated, as specified in the relevant regulations of the Law Enforcement Code, and

(b) For reasons of preservation of evidence upon order of the competent court, as specified in § 143 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

  1. What channels are used to notify the owner of the vehicle’s location (Interpol or other)?
  • Interpol channels and within Schengen countries SIRENE channels
  1. Who is responsible for the storage of seized vehicles?
  • The public authorities but also private companies
  1. Are there any costs associated with storage of a seized stolen vehicle and who is responsible for these costs?
  • Any costs incurred are normally paid by the victim, who can then seek redress from the offender.
  1. How does a stolen vehicle get restored to its legal owner?
  • The procedure is, in principle, a simple one. If ownership is not disputed, the vehicle can be collected from where it is being stored.

a) Do the police have authority to restore the vehicle?

  • In principle – yes

b) Is it the local court who authorises release of the vehicle?

  • In principle – yes

c) Is it necessary to have a “commission rogatoire” to recover the vehicle?

  • In principle – no

d) What documentation does the owner have to provide in order to recover the vehicle?

  • Registration certificate (or an equivalent document, such as the German “Fahrzeugschein”, with a view to providing evidence of ownership) and a copy of the theft report (if possible with translation and certification). If the vehicle is collected by a person other than the owner, written authorization also has to be submitted.
  1. Are there any time limits associated with recovery of the vehicle? (i.e. after a certain period of time the vehicle becomes the property of the state or police, etc.)?
  • In principle – no
  1. Please give details of relevant legislation
  • The relevant legislation is, as indicated above:

Paragraph 22 of the Law Enforcement Code (among other things, this paragraph lays down the conditions of seizure by an authorized official); Paragraph 143 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (court rules regarding the preservation of evidence).

  1. If the law in your country precludes the restitution of a stolen vehicle to its original owner, please give the reasons why
  • The Austrian law defines acquisition in good faith (e.g. of stolen property) very narrowly. For example, the purchase at public auction or from an authorized seller according to §367 of the Austrian Civil Code. Such situations, however, rarely occur in the vehicle sector – if at all – so that acquisition in good faith can normally not be pleaded.
  1. Does your country have any bilateral treaties, conventions, or agreements with other countries dealing with the recovery of stolen property? If so, please describe how they operate and give details of the countries concerned
  • Austria is a party to the European Convention on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. There are, furthermore, numerous bilateral and multilateral agreements – in particular in the form of additional agreements (e.g. with Germany, Switzerland, Italy, etc.). In some cases, the principle of reciprocity is applied (e.g. with Russia).
  1. Reference point, for assistance in case of difficulties
  • Rupert SPRINZL, head of the department for vehicle crime,

tel. 0043/1/24836/85330

fax 0043/1/24836/951313

Last update: January 2008

Recent Posts:

  • Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings
  • Keyless is Meaningless
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme