Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

How Six-Week Weeding Operates (Day-by-Day)

TimeActionNotes  
Day 1A vehicle theft allegation is madeThe victim is issued a crime number.  
 A LoS marker is placed against the VRM on the PNC LoS registerThe PNC manual and 11/2024 NPCC circular advise: ‘the report should be confirmed within 48 hours’  
  If the report is confirmed, the LoS notification is sent to the DVLA who record a ‘stolen’ marker against the VRM.    This LoS marker will remain in place on the PNC until the vehicle is found or it is weeded at 6 years – whichever comes first.  
Day 3The LoS report should be confirmed by now (within 48 hours) BUT if this has NOT occurred  The LoS status is recorded on the PNC, but the DVLA are unaware of the stolen status because the PNC LoS entry has NOT been ‘confirmed’  
Day 14PNC Bureau issues an ‘alert’ to the recording constabulary:   ‘The LoS report has not been ‘confirmed’The LoS status has still not reached the DVLA.  Unaware of the ‘stolen’ report the DVLA will act upon the approach and not notify law enforcement of the activity. The LoS status remains recorded on PNC  
Day 42PNC Bureau issues another alert:   ‘The LoS report has not been ‘confirmed, the LoS marker against the VRM will be removedBy now, the DVLA has been oblivious to the stolen status of the VRM for 6 weeks. Enquiries of the VRM requests for documentation, will have been handled in the ordinary course of business  
Day 43The LoS marker is weeded from PNC as the crime was not ‘confirmed’.The VRM is no longer recorded LoS on the PNC
  The LoS marker having been removed, if checked on PNC, the VRM will appear as though the vehicle has been RECOVERED
  The constabulary’s recovery rate improves (inappropriately) i.e. may artificially inflate clearance/recovery indicators depending on how local MI counts weeded markers.
  Vehicle Provenance Companies, business providing pre-purchase vehicle checks, will return ‘Vehicle NOT recorded stolen’*

In brief:

  1. If not confirmed within 6 weeks (first 42 days):

A vehicle reported stolen, yet unrecovered, will return “clear” at the DVLA

  • If not confirmed after 6 weeks (on day 43 forward):

A vehicle reported stolen, yet unrecovered, will return “clear” on PNC, ANPR, provenance checks, and DVLA systems.


To my knowledge, Claims Management & Adjusting Ltd (CMA) are the only organisation in the UK that monitors the on/off LoS activity on the PNC, particularly at day 43 thereby providing a safety-net for the insured/victim, insurers & the police


Recent Posts:

  • 13. What Better Practice Would Look Like
  • 10. The Power Imbalance
  • Collaboration or Endorsement? A Closer Look at NVCRP Engagement
  • 9. Trackers Do More Than Recover Cars
  • 8. The Theft to Recovery Timeline
  • 7. Investigation – Insurers vs. Police
  • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
  • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
  • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
  • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
  • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
  • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
  • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
  • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme