Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles & Info’
    • The Freedom of Information Act
  • Contact
Menu

UK Constabularies [DVLA, Gwent Police] & The PNC

The UK has 43 police constabularies but for the purpose of recording LoS markers, this number increases.  By way of examples:

  • Scotland is now the subject of a single police constabulary; Police Scotland (Scottish Gaelic: Poileas Alba).  Officially the Police Service of Scotland, formed in 2013, LoS markers are still presented by, or the DVLA continues to record these markers under pre-reform/merge, constabularies of Dumfries and Galloway, Fife etc.
  • There are also specialist units such as NaVCIS* and the NCA that submit LoS markers to the PNC that are received by the DVLA.

*Who appear to submit ‘loss’ notifications as opposed to ‘stolen’; NaVCIS are funded by the Finance & Leasing Association (FLA) i.e. their vehicles/VRMs are more likely to be taken by FRAUD than by THEFT.


The DVLA

The DVLA records ‘stolen’ notifications from multiple sources.

As described above, the DVLA only receives confirmed records.

Assessment of Statistical Distortion Risk

A LoS marker placed to the PNC and confirmed transfers to the DVLA as a matter of routine.

  • Why would there be a difference in the number of VRMs a constabulary records as LoS on the PNC and the number of ‘stolen’ records received by the DVLA?

Gwent Police

The following may apply to other constabularies.  However, Gwent has been highlighted as:

  • Gwent & weeding has more commonly come to our attention
  • An FoIA and Home Office figures were noted indicating the constabulary’s theft numbers were significantly higher than advised to the DVLA
  • The service claimed to have addressed the issue
  • The constabulary appears to accept that weeding was an unnecessary process

Case Study: Gwent Police Data Discrepancy

Why would the number of LoS reports held by the Home Office and Gwent police differ significantly from the LoS records placed with and held by the DVLA?

The figures giving rise to our concerns are as follows and relate to VEHICLES (as opposed to just cars) in 2024:

  • 375     DVLA
  • 1,040  Gwent Police
  • 1,032  Home Office*

*This figure has not been used for comparison as the Home Office data is for financial, as opposed to calendar years. However, the Home Office data suggests over 1,000 vehicle thefts are recorded by Gwent each year – why are the DVLA only aware of 375, what has become of the other 665 stolen notifications?

The source of the information can be found at:

Gwent Police FoIA response 2025/28985:

BBC/Home Office:


Recent Posts:

  • 13. What Better Practice Would Look Like
  • Stolen in Britain, Sold Abroad
  • 12. The Low Cost Check That May Save £1,000’s
  • 11. Good Faith Is Not Enough
  • 10. The Power Imbalance
  • Collaboration or Endorsement? A Closer Look at NVCRP Engagement
  • 9. Trackers Do More Than Recover Cars
  • 8. The Theft to Recovery Timeline
  • 7. Investigation – Insurers vs. Police
  • 6. The Police (Property) Act:
  • 5. Moving the Vehicle Along – Disposal
  • Policy Question: Is Automated Weeding Necessary?
  • 4. Police Powers to Seize Do Not Decide Ownership
  • FOI Update: “Not Held” and the Question of Process
  • 3. Who Helps The Innocent?
  • Remote Technology and Stolen Vehicles
  • 2. The Innocent Purchaser
  • The ICO – running out of time?
  • 1. A Police Crime Report Is Not a Title Decision
  • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
  • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
  • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
  • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
  • £50 for a Police Report Update?
  • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
  • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
  • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
  • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
  • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
  • Accusations of Criminality
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme