Skip to content

Car Crime U.K.

who knows, who cares?

Menu
  • Events Timeline
  • Stolen Vehicle Info’
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
  • Collision & Crime Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • Resources
    • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
    • Police Contacts
  • News
  • Interesting & Reference
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
  • Contact
Menu

‘The Others’ … are you among them?

Posted on May 31, 2025June 9, 2025 by 5@mwosb.co.uk

Police Report Disclosure – the ICO, the NPCC and … ‘The Others’.

They say communications were sent. Important ones. A police constabulary is adamant they contacted key individuals. But, ask for names, and there are none. Request the addresses, ask to see the messages… and the silence is deafening. No records. No replies. No trace. No information held.

Contradictions surface. Official memory grows foggy as one mystery takes hold: who are these people the police claim to have liaised with, simply, teasingly, referred to as ‘The Others‘?

Amidst concerns that any trace of the paper trail will disintegrate, explanations falter, the chilling possibility emerges -they may never have existed!

Were they ghosts of bureaucracy? Convenient inventions to close a file, dodge scrutiny, or bury inconvenient truths?

And so, the hunt begins – not just for the missing correspondence, but for the very reality behind it. In a system built on accountability, who are ‘The Others‘?


The issue of police report disclosure and the 2022 ABI/NPCC (CoLP) MoU was again questioned at the end of 2024. A constabulary, taking issue with a Consent/SAR approach, appeared unsure of their stance; they had approached:

  • The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) and were awaiting the response
  • The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), this would be followed up that evening – we would be copied in

This was a current issue; ‘OTHERS’ were said to also be raising the issue of disclosure, attempting to secure information outside of the 2022 procedure — unsurprisingly, the latest MoU restricted disclosure to ‘select’ insurers. Seemingly, requests presented by ‘The Others’ were repelled.

Weeks passed – no exchanges with the NPCC, ICO or ‘Others’ were provided.

Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) requests were made for the information:

  • The ICO held no information.
  • The NPCC held limited information, nothing related to 2024, but concerns about ‘abuse’ had been raised.
  • The constabulary concerned, despite conveying activity, held no information supporting their interaction with:
    • The NPCC
    • The ICO
    • The Others.

To date, ‘The Others’ have yet to be identified … could this be you?


Despite being a documented process established in 2022, the MoU continues to be interpreted differently by constabularies. Responses range from the unhelpful ‘non-disclosure due to a lack of staff ‘ to the efficient ‘we will act upon written consent’.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts:

  • Crime Reports – Copies of ‘Consent’
  • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
  • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
  • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
  • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
  • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
  • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
  • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
  • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
  • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
  • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
  • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
  • Accuracy & Consistency Required
  • Do we need new legislation?
  • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
  • Which? … What?
  • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
  • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
  • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
  • The Devalued Crime Report
  • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
  • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
  • Vehicle Repatriation
  • Crime Number Devaluation
  • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
  • PNC LoS Report Weeding
  • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
  • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
  • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
  • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
  • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
  • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
  • Police Theft Report Disclosure
  • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
  • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
  • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

Legal Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

No Legal Advice
Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

No Liability
We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

External Links & Third-Party Content
Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

User Responsibility
It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

© 2025 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme