Skip to content
Car Crime U.K.

Car Crime U.K.

Understanding Vehicle Theft, Fraud and Identity

Menu
  • Vehicle Crime
    • ‘Form A Squad’ – Ineffective Action
      • The Vehicle Crime Task Force (VCT) – 2019
      • 2022 to 2023 National Vehicle Crime Working Group
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found in the U.K.
    • Stolen Vehicle Recovery – Found Abroad
    • OPERATION IGNEOUS – reducing reported car theft by 30%
    • Title Law
  • LoS* Data
  • Guidance / Help
    • Abbreviations & Terminology
    • Resources
      • Your Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim
      • Police Contact Emails
    • Links
  • Police Reports
    • Police Theft Reports
    • Police Collision Reports
    • Police Disclosure Delays
  • News
  • Policy & Research
  • Articles Archive
  • Contact
Menu

NaVCIS Funding History

Some 20 years ago, as the story goes, a senior Kent police officer discovered a stash of unallocated constabulary money. Concerned about how vehicle taking was perceived, that its importance was underestimated, he acquired the monies and created the ACPO Vehicle Criminal Intelligence Service (AVCIS) to highlight and address ‘vehicle enabled crime‘ (the use of vehicles in crime).

theft of or from vehicles is no longer regarded as a policing priority by most forces

AVCIS was formed in 2006 to replace the vehicle crime related functions of the National Criminal Intelligence Service which was disbanded with the creation of the Serious Organised Crime Agency and is based in Warwickshire.

In 2015 ACVIS was replaced by the NPCC and AVCIS became known as the National Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (NaVCIS). Originally set up to be responsible for combating organised vehicle crime and the use of vehicles in crime, the goal posts appear to have moved. The NaVCIS Wikipedia page explains:

  • NaVCIS works with a number of other agencies and private companies to maintain the downward pressure on vehicle crime which saw it reduce by 50% between 2001 and 2010-11

The above crime reduction appears attributable to AVCIS (2006 to 2015). Since 2015, vehicle crime, at least ‘taking’ (allegations of THEFT) have been on the increase – save that it appears 2024 may have seen a reduction.

NaVCIS appears more concerned with allegations of FRAUD – and whether these have decreased is unknown.

NaVCIS’ involvement in ‘vehicle enabled crime’ now appears far more constrained. The reason for this may be that the original funding having dried up, they had to look elsewhere for funding … to the Finance & Leasing Association (FLA), currently providing 92% of their funding.

NaVCIS appears less (if anything) to do with vehicle ‘theft’ and more about ‘fraud’; a different offence to ‘taking’ or ‘theft’ of a vehicle i.e. are NaVCIS ‘recoveries’ having any impact upon UK vehicle theft figures; how much of an interest does NaVCIS have in vehicle crime outside of finance-related crime? An indication may be gleaned from their approach to the similar offence of taking Rental Vehicles – read more here.

There appears to be general misunderstanding of vehicle crime and offences in the UK. Possibly this suits some. Examples of a confusion can be read here.

The current role of this vehicle crime unit appears to be very different from the original, involved primarily with finance fraud as opposed to vehicle theft.

Funding

Current (2024):

  • NaVCIS SERVICES FROM 1 APRIL 2024 TO 31 MARCH 2025

In consideration of the provision of these services, the level of the service fee for the extended term commencing 1st April 2024 is £2,283,984 plus VAT, payable in four equal instalments.

Additional figures relating to Ports/containers can be found here.

Previous years:

As per retention guidelines to retain accounting records for 6 financial years plus the current financial year, please see the below breakdown of funding:

 Total Funding
2023-2024£2,193,524
2022-2023£1,929,483
2021-2022£1,948,682
2020-2021£2,125,606
2019-2020£1,859,881
2018-2019£1,774,446

NaVCIS only receive direct funding from one insurance company who subscribes to the freight membership, they have contributed £4,500 per annum since becoming a member in May 2023.

NaVCIS do not currently provide a service directly insurers* (other than restoring stolen vehicles to them that we seize during the course of our operational activities).

NaVCIS do work at UK Ports and work with the Ports Authorities and the Ports Police. NaVCIS has no financial relationship with them*. It is purely operational. The NaVCIS Ports activities are funded by the funding that NaVCIS receives annually from the Finance and Leasing Association (the FLA). The FLA provides funding for NaVCIS Ports and Intelligence Operations.

NaVCIS do not receive any money for providing access to ANPR data*.  NaVCIS does not provide access to ANPR data.

A further breakdown below is of public and private funding:

 Private SectorPublic Sector Total Funding% Private% Public 
2023-2024£2,183,524£10,000£2,193,52499.54%0.46%
2022-2023£1,929,483 £1,929,483100.00%0.00%
2021-2022£1,941,182£7,500£1,948,68299.62%0.38%
2020-2021£2,116,786£8,820£2,125,60699.59%0.41%
2019-2020£1,859,881 £1,859,881100.00%0.00%
2018-2019£1,772,631£1,815£1,774,44699.90%0.10%

    *
    These comments were in response to a request for information dating from 2006, for formation of AVCIS – a somewhat optimistic approach! However, the interest was in particular, for:

    • the funding or financial relationship with ports authorities or ports policing and sums received
    • the sums received for providing access to ANPR data

    The request arose from an understanding, in 2014:

    • a ‘bounty’ of 5% of the value of the vehicle was being sought for vehicle return
    • Insurers were offered assistance; in return for a payment of £10,000 AVCIS would ensure vehicles at Ports would be recovered and would be provided access to ANPR data.

    No information was held – the responses can be read here.


    Related:

    Sharing & Cooperation – Car Crime U.K.

    Recent Posts:

    • The Problem With Crime Numbers:
    • When Recorded Theft Is Not Believed
    • NaVCIS Funding: Still No Specifics
    • Agreed Police disclosure procedures not followed
    • £50 for a Police Report Update?
    • Section 184 Data Protection Act 2018
    • Keyless Taking or Key Questions?
    • When ‘Sale or Return’ Goes Wrong
    • BBC Crimewatch ‘Car Cloning’
    • Keyless Vehicle Theft:
    • Accusations of Criminality
    • Thefts Down – Except for Newer Cars!
    • Increase Pre-Crush Retention Period to 28 days?
    • Reducing Vehicle Theft by up to 30%
    • ‘The Others’ … are you among them?
    • Vehicle Abandonments Raise Questions Over Theft Claims
    • The State of Vehicle Taking in the UK: A Crisis of Enforcement, Not Engineering
    • Keystone Krooks – but £1.4 million stolen!
    • 2024 Vehicle Theft – how well (or otherwise) did your constabulary perform?
    • Vehicle Crime. Is Police Language Bluring Facts?
    • Superficial Approach to Vehicle Taking Overlooked Organised Crime
    • Keyless Vehicle Taking – Really?
    • Accuracy & Consistency Required
    • Do we need new legislation?
    • A System Built on Blind Faith? The Flaws in Police Information Dissemination
    • Which? … What?
    • The Rise & Fall of Operation Igneous
    • Vehicle Taking – Quantity not Quality
    • Vehicle Theft: 30 years of Complacency
    • The Devalued Crime Report
    • Vehicle Theft Surge Demands Police Action on Crime Report Disclosures
    • FoIA – Staffordshire Police are not the worst offenders
    • Vehicle Repatriation
    • Crime Number Devaluation
    • Manufacturers Cause Vehicle Thefts …
    • PNC LoS Report Weeding
    • Staff-less-shire Police Report Disclosures
    • W. Mercia Police – RTC Report Disclosures
    • Delaying Finalisation of Insurance Claims (for some)
    • Policing (or not?) Vehicle Theft
    • Fraud Not Theft … face the facts!
    • Cloned Plates: Register of Keepers – Lacking Integrity?
    • Police Theft Report Disclosure
    • Headlamp Dazzle & Eye-Snatching
    • Scrap ‘six-week weeding’ of stolen vehicle VRMs
    • Police Vehicle Theft Reports – A Lack Of Understanding And Standardisation

    Legal Disclaimer
    The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the content, laws and regulations change frequently, and the application of legal principles varies based on specific circumstances.

    No Legal Advice
    Nothing on this website constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. You should not rely on the information provided here as a substitute for seeking qualified legal counsel. If you require legal advice or guidance, we strongly recommend consulting a licensed solicitor or legal professional.

    No Liability
    We make every effort to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or applicability of any content. We accept no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or reliance placed on the information contained within this site.

    External Links & Third-Party Content
    Any external links or references provided are for convenience only and do not constitute endorsement. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of any external sites or third-party materials linked from this website.

    User Responsibility
    It is the responsibility of all users to verify the accuracy and relevance of any information before relying upon it. If you have a legal issue, you should seek advice from a qualified professional relevant to your situation.

    By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer. If you do not agree, you should discontinue use of the site immediately.

    © 2026 Car Crime U.K. | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme